POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · NOTTINGHAM OPEN: KAROLINA PLISKOVA VS CATY MCNALLY
Nottingham Open: Karolina Pliskova vs Caty McNally
100.0¢
0.1¢
▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle
polymarket · wta-pliskov-mcnally-2026-06-18 · fresh · feed 2s old24h sparkline · 60 pts▼ —
realized vol (ann.)
2968.48%
max drawdown
56.32%
sharpe
—
ulcer index
15.17%
RMS drawdown
pain index
6.38%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
—
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
49.91%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
1.65
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
—
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
1.65
upside/downside
roll spread
24.8 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
706
store
spread
—
24h Δ
—
flow lean
—
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API:
/api/m2m/pm-wta-pliskov-mcnally-2026-06-18/bundle · venue execution: polymarket →LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH⏱--:--:-- UTCNEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
100.0¢
NO · live
0.1¢
25 ticks · last 99.95¢
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.006 / 1.00 bits (1%) · informative — one side favoured
YES100.0%100.0¢1.00×▬ +0.00pp
NO0.1%0.1¢2000.00×▬ +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Σ 6195bp moved · peak 2500bp · n=24 ticks
2.2s
99.95¢ (99.95%)
0.05¢ (0.05%)
100.00%
0.000pp
$339.0k
$659.8k
25 ticks (live)
§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 99.95¢
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 0.05¢
§2 · Distribution of Δp
n=24
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.
§3 · Sample moments
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=6.25)
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
SKEWNESS · G₁2.667right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂6.252leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.
§5 · Time-series structure
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: TRENDING · variance ratio > 1
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 1.257STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent0.45
mean-reverting0.5
random walk0.55
persistent1
strongly trending
anti-persistent0.45
mean-reverting0.5
random walk0.55
persistent1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.
§6 · Microstructure
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
TWO-SIDED PRICING
99.95¢
0.05¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.
§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis
FAIR MARKET · no edge
Probability scale (YES)
Implied decimal odds
YES1.00×(100¢)NO2000.00×(0¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.006 bits (1% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.
§8 · Time decay & θ projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-25 09:00 UTC
6days
20hrs
03min
YES →$1.00
NO →$0.00
current: $0.9995 · expected return per side: $0.00 on YES hit · $1.00 on NO hit
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 62.351 pp/day
now6.84d left62.351 pp/day×1.00
−25%5.13d left71.997 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.42d left88.178 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.71d left124.703 pp/day×2.00
−90%16.41h left197.172 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.
§9 · Hourly return heatmap
7 up bars · 3 down · best 25.00% · worst -3.00% · typical |Δ| 2.581%
§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown
final equity 1.5688 (56.88%) · max DD -4.48% · time-under-water 20/25 bars
§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)
latest 69.023 · range [-36.50, 69.02] · μ 11.026 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
latest 1088.29% · range [0.00%, 1088.29%] · μ 197.99% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
latest -0.007 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk
§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)
1 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence1 reject·5 pass·α = 0.05
Jarque-Bera
REJECT H₀***H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)
STATISTIC
94.7596
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
Ljung-Box(h=5)
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5
STATISTIC
8.7594
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1179
Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)
STATISTIC
3.1817
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9990
Wald-Wolfowitz runs
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random
STATISTIC
-0.9820
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3261
KPSS (μ stationarity)
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: p IS level-stationary
STATISTIC
0.3913
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0809
Variance ratio q=3
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1
STATISTIC
1.6080
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1078
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).
§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)
dominant period ≈ 24.00h (freq 0.042) · concentrates 18.7% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 5.419e-2
▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (706 bars · effective 1753005 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.
§14 · Honest position analytics
A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →
§15 · Horizon returns
Horizon 6.8 d · σ/bar 2.243pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 28.73ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0005 · n = 706✓ n = 706
μ per bar
+0.076pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
2.243pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
10.99pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move7d
28.73pp
σ × √164.06262805555556
Terminal variancebinary
0.0005
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
100.0¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.
§16 · Tail risk
VaR₉₅ 3.61pp · ES₉₅ 4.55pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.076pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 1.00pp · unique ratio 0.03✓ n = 706
VaR 95%
3.61pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
4.55pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
56.3pp
peak 95.0¢ → trough 41.5¢
Median step
1.00pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.
§17 · Odds conversion
Implied probabilityP
100.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
1.001
total return per $1
AmericanUS
-199900
risk $199900 to win $100
FractionalUK
0.00 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$0.05
clean dollar framing
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.
§18 · Binary entropy
Market entropyH(p)
0.006 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.006 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
0.00 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
10.97 bit
self-information
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.
§19 · Model-dependent surfaces
External model required
The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.
The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.
To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.
§∞ · Provenance & attestation
- Upstream (snapshot)
- gamma-api.polymarket.com
- Upstream (history)
- clob.polymarket.com
- YES token ID
24969106554141960757844132284763186128876231480448582906394559067988766056204- NO token ID
27784879744130759674639770257909728613674223167198031607606534321864561515762- Snapshot fetched
- 2026-06-18 12:56:12 UTC
- Snapshot age
- 2.2s
- History points
- 25 CLOB mids
- Page rendered
- 2026-06-18 12:56:14 UTC
- Storage policy
- no persistence — fetched on every request
- SHA-256 attestation
72a7aa53135aa9abdee5eb3498da24a79cadab7c8422cab090718ce8b8b656cf· deterministic hash of source snapshot- Open data licence
- CC0 / public domain
§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more
HL PREDSpain89.3¢HL PREDBrazil88.2¢HL PREDEcuador76.0¢POLYMARKETWill Congo DR win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?0¢POLYMARKETWill Colombia win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?2¢POLYMARKETWill Czechia win on 2026-06-18?54¢HL PERPBTC-USD perpetual$64,333HL PERPHYPE-USD perpetual$71.7HL PERPETH-USD perpetual$1,748.8
Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Nottingham Open: Karolina Pliskova vs Caty McNally
Market depth
▸ live order book · Polymarket YESDepth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
—
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
—
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+1.000
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
+1.000
bid-heavy top-of-book
Slippage scenarios
▸ live book walk · Polymarket YESSimulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-wta-pliskov-mcnally-2026-06-18/slippage?size=10000&side=buy
| Side | Notional | Avg fill | Slippage | Worst fill | Levels | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUY | $1.00K | — | — | — | — | ERR |
| BUY | $10.00K | — | — | — | — | ERR |
| BUY | $100.00K | — | — | — | — | ERR |
| SELL | $1.00K | — | — | — | — | ERR |
| SELL | $10.00K | — | — | — | — | ERR |
| SELL | $100.00K | — | — | — | — | ERR |
Risk metrics
▸ sovereign store · 706 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75MRealized vol (annualised)
4707.75%
σ per bar = 0.035557
Mean return (annualised)
190273.86%
μ per bar = 0.001085
Sharpe (rf=0)
40.42
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
56.32%
peak 0.95 → trough 0.41 over 50 bars
/api/asset/pm-wta-pliskov-mcnally-2026-06-18/risk · same metrics, JSON