POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · ELON MUSK # TWEETS JUNE 9 - JUNE 16, 2026?

Will Elon Musk post 320-339 tweets from June 9 to June 16, 2026?

YES · live
0.1¢
NO · live
100.0¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · elon-musk-of-tweets-june-9-june-16-320-339 · fresh · feed 0s old
realized vol (ann.)
max drawdown
sharpe
ulcer index
RMS drawdown
pain index
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
upside/downside
roll spread
implied (price-only)
bars used
0
insufficient
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 0%
  • insufficient history for risk metrics — directional read only
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-9-june-16-320-339/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH5ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
0.1¢
NO · live
100.0¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.0009 · σ=0.0008 · range [0.0005, 0.0030] · R²=0.463 FALLING -80.00%σ EXTREME 91.73%LAST 0.00050.00300.00240.00180.00110.0005μ = 0.0009max 0.0030min 0.0005dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.46μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 0.05¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 0.1%NO 100.0%NO100.0%99.95¢ · odds 1/1.00
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.006 / 1.00 bits (1%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
0.1%0.1¢2000.00× +0.00pp
NO
100.0%100.0¢1.00× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=30 · μ=1.3 · σ=3.0 · CV=2.43BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=4035810μ = 11050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 30bp moved · peak 10bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
5ms
YES mid
0.05¢ (0.05%)
NO mid
99.95¢ (99.95%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$64.2k
liquidity $
$93.7k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.0009 · σ=0.0008 · range [0.0005, 0.0030] · R²=0.463 FALLING -80.00%σ EXTREME 91.73%LAST 0.00050.00300.00240.00180.00110.0005μ = 0.0009max 0.0030min 0.0005dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.46μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 0.05¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.9991 · σ=0.0008 · range [0.9970, 0.9995] · R²=0.463 RISING +0.20%σ LOW 0.08%LAST 0.99950.99950.99890.99830.99760.9970μ = 0.9991max 0.9995min 0.9970dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.46μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 99.95¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=-0.0001 · σ=0.0003 · skew=-1.93 (left-skewed) · kurt=3.87 (leptokurtic (fat tails))201510502-0.09ppbin -0.09pp · n=2 · 10.0% peakbin -0.09pp · n=2 · 10.0% peak-0.08pp-0.06pp1-0.05ppbin -0.05pp · n=1 · 5.0% peakbin -0.05pp · n=1 · 5.0% peak-0.03pp-0.02pp20-0.00ppbin -0.00pp · n=20 · 100.0% peakbin -0.00pp · n=20 · 100.0% peak0.01pp0.03pp10.04ppbin 0.04pp · n=1 · 5.0% peakbin 0.04pp · n=1 · 5.0% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-1.93 · kurt=3.87 · near 7 / mid 12 / far 5 · OLS slope=0.74 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSTHIN UPPER TAILMILDLY HEAVY LOWER-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25STRONGLY RIGHT-SKEWED (G₁=1.63)
μ MEAN0.09¢95% CI: [0.06¢, 0.12¢]
σ STD DEV0.08ppσ² = 65.167×10⁻⁴ · CV = 91.73%
med MEDIAN0.05¢Q₁ 0.05¢ · Q₃ 0.05¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 0.05¢Q₁ 0.05¢med 0.05¢Q₃ 0.05¢max 0.30¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁1.629right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂0.902mesokurtic · normal-like
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.47
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 0.00
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.10
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: TRENDING · variance ratio > 1
ρ(1) AUTOCORR+0.461positive · momentum
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.095lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT1.117strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT-4.451significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 1.117STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1+0.461k=2-0.095k=3-0.295k=4-0.048k=5-0.0150+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONTRENDING · variance ratio > 1from Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=4.45)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2449837
SLUGelon-musk-of-tweets-june-9-june-16-320-339
CATEGORYElon Musk # tweets June 9 - June 16, 2026?
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES0.05¢implied prob 0.05% · decimal odds 2000.00×
COUNTER · NO99.95¢implied prob 99.95% · decimal odds 1.00×
0.05¢
99.95¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME64.22k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY93.72k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (100¢)|primary − counter| = 0.999 · entropy 0.006 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 0.1%NO 100.0%YES0.1%H = 0.006 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES2000.00×(0¢)NO1.00×(100¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.006 bits (1% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · MEDIUMresolves 2026-06-16 16:00 UTC
1days
20hrs
46min
YES$1.00(P = 0.1%)
NO$0.00(P = 100.0%)
current: $0.0005 · expected return per side: $1.00 on YES hit · $0.00 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+0.9dRESOLVESP projection · σ=0.08% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 0.395 pp/day
now1.87d left
0.395 pp/day×1.00
−25%1.40d left
0.457 pp/day×1.15
−50%22.39h left
0.559 pp/day×1.41
−75%11.19h left
0.791 pp/day×2.00
−90%4.48h left
1.251 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 0.05% · worst -0.10% · typical |Δ| 0.01%MILD BEARISH -0.20%BEST+0.05%2hWORST-0.10%4hTYPICAL |Δ|0.01%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE-0.20%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ -0.03% · Σ -0.20%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.00% · Σ +0.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.00% · Σ +0.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final -0.20%+0.05%-0.20%0.00% · 1h0.00% · 1h·1h0.05% · 2h0.05% · 2h0.05%2h★ BEST-0.05% · 3h-0.05% · 3h-0.05%3h-0.10% · 4h-0.10% · 4h-0.10%4h▼ WORST-0.10% · 5h-0.10% · 5h-0.10%5h0.00% · 6h0.00% · 6h·6h0.00% · 7h0.00% · 7h·7h0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h0.00% · 13h0.00% · 13h·13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.00% · 15h0.00% · 15h·15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h0.00% · 18h0.00% · 18h·18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h0.00% · 23h0.00% · 23h·23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNuniform across sessionsRUNSup max 1 · down max 3BREADTH4% up · 13% down · 83% flat
1 up bars · 3 down · best 0.05% · worst -0.10% · typical |Δ| 0.013%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsLOSS · SHALLOW DD (-0.20%)FINAL-0.20%MAX DD-0.25%RECOVERYONGOING · 22 barsMAX RUN-UP+0.05%UNDERWATER22/25 (88%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 0.9980 · peak 1.0005 · range [0.9980, 1.0005]1.00050.9980break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0005UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -0.25% · shallow0%-0.25%▼ TROUGH -0.25%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 1 total#1 -0.25%bar 4-25 · 22 bars · ONGOINGDD SEVERITYshallow (max -0.25%)RECOVERYongoing · 22 barsTIME UNDER WATER88% of session · 22/25 bars
final equity 0.9980 (-0.20%) · max DD -0.25% · time-under-water 22/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +0 / −5 (0% positive) · μ=-14.79 · σ=26.41UNPROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 0.00 (+0.56σ vs μ)79.3339.660.00-39.66-79.33μ = -14.79-51.52-51.52-51.52-51.52-79.33-79.33-60.42-60.42-38.21-38.210.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 0.000 · range [-79.33, 0.00] · μ -14.789 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=1.2942 · σ=2.2552 · range [0.0000, 5.6675] · R²=0.598 FALLING -100.00%σ EXTREME 174.25%LAST 0.00005.66754.25062.83371.41690.0000μ = 1.2942max 5.6675min 0.0000dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.60μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 0.00% · range [0.00%, 5.67%] · μ 1.29% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +4 / −1 (21% positive) · μ=0.064 · σ=0.141MEAN-REVERSIONLAST 0.000 (-0.45σ vs μ)0.4170.2080.000-0.208-0.417μ = 0.0640.2580.2580.1670.1670.4080.4080.4170.417-0.033-0.0330.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 0.000 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
3 of 5 REJECT · mixed evidence3 reject·2 pass·1 n/a·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
43.1565
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
8.6884
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1210
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-2.1017
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2534
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

N/An/a

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
p-VALUE (log scale)
no decision possibleinsufficient sign variety (1+/3-)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.5171
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0378
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

REJECT H₀*

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
2.0250
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0429
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zoneVR 1.616 → trending
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=9.90e-8 · top T=8.00h (17.5%) · top-3 cover 50.5%1 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEcumulative energy ↗ (1 bin above 2× noise)2.1e-71.6e-71.0e-75.2e-80.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 1.75e-7 · 14.8% energyperiod 24.0 · power 1.75e-7 · 14.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.94e-7 · 16.4% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.94e-7 · 16.4% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.07e-7 · 17.5% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.07e-7 · 17.5% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.98e-7 · 16.7% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.98e-7 · 16.7% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.61e-7 · 13.5% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.61e-7 · 13.5% energyperiod 4.0 · power 1.04e-7 · 8.8% energyperiod 4.0 · power 1.04e-7 · 8.8% energyperiod 3.4 · power 4.77e-8 · 4.0% energyperiod 3.4 · power 4.77e-8 · 4.0% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.04e-8 · 0.9% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.04e-8 · 0.9% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.05e-9 · 0.1% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.05e-9 · 0.1% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.40e-8 · 1.2% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.40e-8 · 1.2% energyperiod 2.2 · power 3.30e-8 · 2.8% energyperiod 2.2 · power 3.30e-8 · 2.8% energyperiod 2.0 · power 4.17e-8 · 3.5% energyperiod 2.0 · power 4.17e-8 · 3.5% energy50% by T=6.0h#1 dominantT=8.00h#2T=6.00h#3T=12.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 8.00h (freq 0.125) · concentrates 17.5% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 1.188e-6

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 1.9 d · σ/bar 0.032pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.21ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0005 · n = 25low confidence · n < 100
μ per bar
-0.008pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.032pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.16pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move2d
0.21pp
σ × √44.77686805555555
Terminal variancebinary
0.0005
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
0.1¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.06pp · ES₉₅ 0.07pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift -0.008pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.10pp · unique ratio 0.16disabled · n < 30
VaR 95%
0.06pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.07pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
83.3pp
peak 0.3¢ → trough 0.1¢
Median step
0.10pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
0.1%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
2000.000
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+199900
$100 wins $199900
FractionalUK
1999.00 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$199900.00
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 0.1%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.006 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.006 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
10.97 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.00 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
60455860637972061932984708351432546044248076687334005548989239998546301869841
NO token ID
255243950895025235613923072035414292717188161705838663451902734884432443270
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 19:13:23 UTC
Snapshot age
5ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 19:13:23 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
de043d90c1a35efea78f6c2e31a8b0d199bee2c002e571b9db16364801e915bc · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Elon Musk # tweets June 9 - June 16, 2026?

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-1.000
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-1.000
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-9-june-16-320-339/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00KERR
BUY$10.00KERR
BUY$100.00KERR
SELL$1.00KERR
SELL$10.00KERR
SELL$100.00KERR

Risk metrics

upstream candles · 25 bars
Realized vol (annualised)
σ per bar = 0.249037
Mean return (annualised)
μ per bar = -0.067060
Sharpe (rf=0)
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
83.33%
peak 0.00 → trough 0.00 over 3 bars

/api/asset/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-9-june-16-320-339/risk · same metrics, JSON