POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · ELON MUSK # TWEETS JUNE 16 - JUNE 23, 2026?

Will Elon Musk post 180-199 tweets from June 16 to June 23, 2026?

YES · live
37.5¢
NO · live
62.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · elon-musk-of-tweets-june-16-june-23-180-199 · fresh · feed 6s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
169.54%
max drawdown
5.33%
sharpe
ulcer index
3.17%
RMS drawdown
pain index
2.34%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
5.33%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
2.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
2.00
upside/downside
roll spread
2.2 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
1037
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-16-june-23-180-199/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH6.5s--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
37.5¢
NO · live
62.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.2938 · σ=0.0469 · range [0.2350, 0.3750] · R²=0.668 RISING +41.51%σ EXTREME 15.95%LAST 0.37500.37500.34000.30500.27000.2350μ = 0.2938max 0.3750min 0.2350dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.67μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 37.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 37.5%NO 62.5%NO62.5%62.50¢ · odds 1/1.60
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.954 / 1.00 bits (95%) · max uncertainty (~50/50)
YES
37.5%37.5¢2.67× +0.00pp
NO
62.5%62.5¢1.60× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=3,300 · μ=137.5 · σ=132.9 · CV=0.97BURSTYcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=90150300450600μ = 13860050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 3300bp moved · peak 600bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
6.5s
YES mid
37.50¢ (37.50%)
NO mid
62.50¢ (62.50%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$29.5k
liquidity $
$28.5k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.2938 · σ=0.0469 · range [0.2350, 0.3750] · R²=0.668 RISING +41.51%σ EXTREME 15.95%LAST 0.37500.37500.34000.30500.27000.2350μ = 0.2938max 0.3750min 0.2350dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.67μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 37.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.7062 · σ=0.0469 · range [0.6250, 0.7650] · R²=0.668 FALLING -14.97%σ HIGH 6.64%LAST 0.62500.76500.73000.69500.66000.6250μ = 0.7062max 0.7650min 0.6250dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.67μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 62.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0034 · σ=0.0170 · skew=-1.58 (left-skewed) · kurt=3.48 (leptokurtic (fat tails))754201-5.55ppbin -5.55pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin -5.55pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak-4.65pp-3.75pp-2.85pp1-1.95ppbin -1.95pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin -1.95pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak3-1.05ppbin -1.05pp · n=3 · 42.9% peakbin -1.05pp · n=3 · 42.9% peak6-0.15ppbin -0.15pp · n=6 · 85.7% peakbin -0.15pp · n=6 · 85.7% peak40.75ppbin 0.75pp · n=4 · 57.1% peakbin 0.75pp · n=4 · 57.1% peak71.65ppbin 1.65pp · n=7 · 100.0% peakbin 1.65pp · n=7 · 100.0% peak22.55ppbin 2.55pp · n=2 · 28.6% peakbin 2.55pp · n=2 · 28.6% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-1.67 · kurt=3.88 · near 17 / mid 6 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.94 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25RIGHT-SKEWED (G₁=0.52)
μ MEAN29.38¢95% CI: [27.54¢, 31.22¢]
σ STD DEV4.69ppσ² = 21.964 · CV = 15.95%
med MEDIAN27.50¢Q₁ 25.50¢ · Q₃ 33.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 23.50¢Q₁ 25.50¢med 27.50¢Q₃ 33.50¢max 37.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁0.524right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-1.253platykurtic · thin tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.40
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 0.79
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 2.99
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.26 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.256within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.112lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.850strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+6.800significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.850STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.256k=2+0.112k=3-0.139k=4+0.157k=5-0.0080+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.26 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.96very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=6.80)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2528018
SLUGelon-musk-of-tweets-june-16-june-23-180-199
CATEGORYElon Musk # tweets June 16 - June 23, 2026?
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES37.50¢implied prob 37.50% · decimal odds 2.67×
COUNTER · NO62.50¢implied prob 62.50% · decimal odds 1.60×
37.50¢
62.50¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME29.45k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY28.49k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (63¢)|primary − counter| = 0.250 · entropy 0.954 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 37.5%NO 62.5%YES37.5%H = 0.954 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES2.67×(38¢)NO1.60×(63¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.954 bits (95% of max) · maximum uncertainty (~50/50)
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-23 16:00 UTC
3days
03hrs
45min
YES$1.00(P = 37.5%)
NO$0.00(P = 62.5%)
current: $0.3750 · expected return per side: $0.63 on YES hit · $0.38 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+1.6dRESOLVESP projection · σ=4.69% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 22.960 pp/day
now3.16d left
22.960 pp/day×1.00
−25%2.37d left
26.511 pp/day×1.15
−50%1.58d left
32.470 pp/day×1.41
−75%18.94h left
45.919 pp/day×2.00
−90%7.58h left
72.604 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 3.00% · worst -6.00% · typical |Δ| 1.38%MILD BULLISH +11.00%BEST+3.00%17hWORST-6.00%6hTYPICAL |Δ|1.38%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+11.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ -0.14% · Σ -1.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.50% · Σ +4.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +1.00% · Σ +8.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +11.00%+11.00%-3.00%0.00% · 1h0.00% · 1h·1h-1.00% · 2h-1.00% · 2h-1.00%2h1.00% · 3h1.00% · 3h1.00%3h2.50% · 4h2.50% · 4h2.50%4h0.50% · 5h0.50% · 5h0.50%5h-6.00% · 6h-6.00% · 6h-6.00%6h▼ WORST2.00% · 7h2.00% · 7h2.00%7h-2.00% · 8h-2.00% · 8h-2.00%8h2.00% · 9h2.00% · 9h2.00%9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h-1.00% · 12h-1.00% · 12h-1.00%12h2.00% · 13h2.00% · 13h2.00%13h1.00% · 14h1.00% · 14h1.00%14h2.00% · 15h2.00% · 15h2.00%15h1.00% · 16h1.00% · 16h1.00%16h3.00% · 17h3.00% · 17h3.00%17h★ BEST-1.00% · 18h-1.00% · 18h-1.00%18h1.50% · 19h1.50% · 19h1.50%19h1.50% · 20h1.50% · 20h1.50%20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h2.00% · 22h2.00% · 22h2.00%22h0.00% · 23h0.00% · 23h·23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+8.00%)RUNSup max 5 · down max 1BREADTH54% up · 21% down · 25% flat
13 up bars · 5 down · best 3.00% · worst -6.00% · typical |Δ| 1.375%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +11.14%FINAL+11.14%MAX DD-6.04%RECOVERYFULLY RECOVEREDMAX RUN-UP+11.14%UNDERWATER13/25 (52%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.1114 · peak 1.1114 · range [0.9678, 1.1114]1.11140.9678break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.1114UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -6.04% · significant0%-6.04%▼ TROUGH -6.04%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 3 total#1 -6.04%bar 7-16 · 10 bars · recovered#2 -1.00%bar 3-4 · 2 bars · recovered#3 -1.00%bar 19-19 · 1 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYsignificant (max -6.04%)RECOVERYfully recoveredTIME UNDER WATER52% of session · 13/25 bars
final equity 1.1114 (11.14%) · max DD -6.04% · time-under-water 13/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +13 / −6 (68% positive) · μ=40.02 · σ=43.54PROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 83.78 (+1.00σ vs μ)93.8946.940.00-46.94-93.89μ = 40.02-15.96-15.96-5.02-5.02-9.78-9.78-4.73-4.73-17.96-17.96-20.72-20.729.749.749.749.7451.5251.5251.5251.5266.7266.7291.3491.3491.3491.3487.8187.8193.8993.8967.9067.9075.9675.9653.3753.3783.7883.78v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 83.781 · range [-20.72, 93.89] · μ 40.024 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=175.7765 · σ=81.0610 · range [87.1321, 308.5320] · R²=0.708 FALLING -68.25%σ EXTREME 46.12%LAST 87.1321308.5320253.1820197.8320142.482187.1321μ = 175.7765max 308.5320min 87.1321dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.71μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 87.13% · range [87.13%, 308.53%] · μ 175.78% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +2 / −17 (11% positive) · μ=-0.372 · σ=0.216MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.314 (+0.27σ vs μ)0.6260.3130.000-0.313-0.626μ = -0.3720.0230.023-0.261-0.261-0.309-0.309-0.418-0.418-0.556-0.556-0.422-0.422-0.626-0.626-0.483-0.483-0.152-0.1520.0300.030-0.004-0.004-0.298-0.298-0.548-0.548-0.599-0.599-0.569-0.569-0.553-0.553-0.575-0.575-0.443-0.443-0.314-0.314v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.314 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
39.0517
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
3.4810
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.6288
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-0.2550
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9250
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
1.0934
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2742
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (10 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.7164
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0121
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-0.7306
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4650
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.778 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=3.88e-4 · top T=2.00h (25.9%) · top-3 cover 51.1%1 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEcumulative energy ↗ (1 bin above 2× noise)1.2e-39.0e-46.0e-43.0e-40.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 4.65e-4 · 10.0% energyperiod 24.0 · power 4.65e-4 · 10.0% energyperiod 12.0 · power 6.37e-5 · 1.4% energyperiod 12.0 · power 6.37e-5 · 1.4% energyperiod 8.0 · power 1.79e-5 · 0.4% energyperiod 8.0 · power 1.79e-5 · 0.4% energyperiod 6.0 · power 5.54e-4 · 11.9% energyperiod 6.0 · power 5.54e-4 · 11.9% energyperiod 4.8 · power 3.16e-4 · 6.8% energyperiod 4.8 · power 3.16e-4 · 6.8% energyperiod 4.0 · power 2.08e-4 · 4.5% energyperiod 4.0 · power 2.08e-4 · 4.5% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.14e-4 · 2.5% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.14e-4 · 2.5% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.17e-4 · 13.3% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.17e-4 · 13.3% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.95e-4 · 4.2% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.95e-4 · 4.2% energyperiod 2.4 · power 4.03e-4 · 8.7% energyperiod 2.4 · power 4.03e-4 · 8.7% energyperiod 2.2 · power 4.93e-4 · 10.6% energyperiod 2.2 · power 4.93e-4 · 10.6% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.20e-3 · 25.9% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.20e-3 · 25.9% energy50% by T=3.0h#1 dominantT=2.00h#2T=3.00h#3T=6.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.00h (freq 0.500) · concentrates 25.9% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 4.650e-3

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (1037 bars · effective 1752713 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 3.2 d · σ/bar 0.128pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 1.11ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.2344 · n = 1037n = 1037
μ per bar
+0.004pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.128pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.63pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move3d
1.11pp
σ × √75.75439333333333
Terminal variancebinary
0.2344
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
37.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.21pp · ES₉₅ 0.26pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.004pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.50pp · unique ratio 0.01n = 1037
VaR 95%
0.21pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.26pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
5.3pp
peak 37.5¢ → trough 35.5¢
Median step
0.50pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
37.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
2.667
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+167
$100 wins $167
FractionalUK
1.67 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$166.67
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 37.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.954 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.954 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
1.42 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.68 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
98307459114237247062027754282577575390093690690915136660880559027982995193371
NO token ID
70473470942187177363840305842101782468240274740649658467165924494159278824999
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-20 12:14:37 UTC
Snapshot age
6.5s
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-20 12:14:44 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
0d715bb66d913618b1b156db9e141dae7c27ff12da3c38883857e99ac0a63b96 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Elon Musk # tweets June 16 - June 23, 2026?

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.375000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
266.7bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.133
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.094
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-16-june-23-180-199/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.400823688.62bp0.4100004FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.5210723895.24bp0.65000024FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.82854912094.65bp0.99000046PARTIAL
SELL$1.00K0.359209421.09bp0.3400004FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.0573578470.48bp0.01000036PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.0573578470.48bp0.01000036PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 1,037 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
478.13%
σ per bar = 0.003612
Mean return (annualised)
19082.83%
μ per bar = 0.000109
Sharpe (rf=0)
39.91
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
5.33%
peak 0.38 → trough 0.35 over 133 bars

/api/asset/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-16-june-23-180-199/risk · same metrics, JSON