POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · ATLANTA DREAM VS. TORONTO TEMPO

Atlanta Dream vs. Toronto Tempo

YES · live
100.0¢
NO · live
0.1¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · wnba-atl-tor-2026-06-14 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
1021.43%
max drawdown
1.05%
sharpe
ulcer index
0.40%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.15%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
1.05%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
27.45
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
27.45
upside/downside
roll spread
17.0 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
346
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-wnba-atl-tor-2026-06-14/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH9ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
100.0¢
NO · live
0.1¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.7294 · σ=0.0840 · range [0.6850, 0.9995] · R²=0.327 RISING +41.77%σ HIGH 11.52%LAST 0.99950.99950.92090.84230.76360.6850μ = 0.7294max 0.9995min 0.6850dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.33μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 99.95¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 100.0%NO 0.1%YES100.0%99.95¢ · odds 1/1.00
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.006 / 1.00 bits (1%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
100.0%100.0¢1.00× +0.00pp
NO
0.1%0.1¢2000.00× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=4,045 · μ=168.5 · σ=375.5 · CV=2.23BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=2203757501,1251,500μ = 1691,50050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 4045bp moved · peak 1500bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
9ms
YES mid
99.95¢ (99.95%)
NO mid
0.05¢ (0.05%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$111.1k
liquidity $
$341.8k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.7294 · σ=0.0840 · range [0.6850, 0.9995] · R²=0.327 RISING +41.77%σ HIGH 11.52%LAST 0.99950.99950.92090.84230.76360.6850μ = 0.7294max 0.9995min 0.6850dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.33μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 99.95¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.2706 · σ=0.0840 · range [0.0005, 0.3150] · R²=0.327 FALLING -99.83%σ EXTREME 31.05%LAST 0.00050.31500.23640.15780.07910.0005μ = 0.2706max 0.3150min 0.0005dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.33μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 0.05¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0140 · σ=0.0374 · skew=2.65 (right-skewed) · kurt=5.88 (leptokurtic (fat tails))13107306-1.15ppbin -1.15pp · n=6 · 46.2% peakbin -1.15pp · n=6 · 46.2% peak130.55ppbin 0.55pp · n=13 · 100.0% peakbin 0.55pp · n=13 · 100.0% peak32.25ppbin 2.25pp · n=3 · 23.1% peakbin 2.25pp · n=3 · 23.1% peak3.95pp5.65pp7.35pp9.05pp10.75pp112.45ppbin 12.45pp · n=1 · 7.7% peakbin 12.45pp · n=1 · 7.7% peak114.15ppbin 14.15pp · n=1 · 7.7% peakbin 14.15pp · n=1 · 7.7% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=2.78 · kurt=6.48 · near 7 / mid 14 / far 3 · OLS slope=0.74 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSMILDLY HEAVY UPPERTHIN LOWER TAIL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+1.54σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=4.46)
μ MEAN72.94¢95% CI: [69.65¢, 76.24¢]
σ STD DEV8.40ppσ² = 70.578 · CV = 11.52%
med MEDIAN70.50¢Q₁ 69.50¢ · Q₃ 70.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 68.50¢Q₁ 69.50¢med 70.50¢Q₃ 70.50¢max 99.95¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁2.430right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂4.459leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.29
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 11.33
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.74
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: TRENDING · variance ratio > 1
ρ(1) AUTOCORR+0.470positive · momentum
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.040lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.906strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+3.343significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.906STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1+0.470k=2+0.040k=3-0.017k=4-0.031k=5+0.0040+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONTRENDING · variance ratio > 1from Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=3.34)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2406843
SLUGwnba-atl-tor-2026-06-14
CATEGORYAtlanta Dream vs. Toronto Tempo
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES99.95¢implied prob 99.95% · decimal odds 1.00×
COUNTER · NO0.05¢implied prob 0.05% · decimal odds 2000.00×
99.95¢
0.05¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME111.07k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY341.78k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS YES (100¢)|primary − counter| = 0.999 · entropy 0.006 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHDEEP100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 100.0%NO 0.1%YES100.0%H = 0.006 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES1.00×(100¢)NO2000.00×(0¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.006 bits (1% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 15.00% · worst -2.00% · typical |Δ| 1.69%MILD BULLISH +29.45%BEST+15.00%22hWORST-2.00%1hTYPICAL |Δ|1.69%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+29.45%Σ signed ΔSTREAK↗ 3up-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.14% · Σ +1.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.19% · Σ -1.50%US · 16-24 UTCμ +3.45% · Σ +27.60%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +29.45%+29.45%-2.00%-2.00% · 1h-2.00% · 1h-2.00%1h▼ WORST2.00% · 2h2.00% · 2h2.00%2h-1.00% · 3h-1.00% · 3h-1.00%3h-0.50% · 4h-0.50% · 4h-0.50%4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h0.50% · 6h0.50% · 6h0.50%6h2.00% · 7h2.00% · 7h2.00%7h-0.50% · 8h-0.50% · 8h-0.50%8h-0.50% · 9h-0.50% · 9h-0.50%9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h-1.00% · 11h-1.00% · 11h-1.00%11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h0.00% · 13h0.00% · 13h·13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.50% · 15h0.50% · 15h0.50%15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.50% · 17h0.50% · 17h0.50%17h0.00% · 18h0.00% · 18h·18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h15.00% · 22h15.00% · 22h15.00%22h★ BEST12.10% · 23h12.10% · 23h12.10%23h2.35% · 24h2.35% · 24h2.35%24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+27.60%)RUNSup max 3 · down max 2BREADTH33% up · 25% down · 42% flat
8 up bars · 6 down · best 15.00% · worst -2.00% · typical |Δ| 1.685%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsSTRONG PROFIT +31.84% · SHALLOW DDFINAL+31.84%MAX DD-2.00%RECOVERYFULLY RECOVEREDMAX RUN-UP+31.84%UNDERWATER20/25 (80%)STREAK↗ 3EQUITY CURVE · end 1.3184 · peak 1.3184 · range [0.9800, 1.3184]1.31840.9800break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.3184UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -2.00% · moderate0%-2.00%▼ TROUGH -2.00%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 2 total#1 -2.00%bar 2-7 · 6 bars · recovered#2 -1.99%bar 9-22 · 14 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYmoderate (max -2.00%)RECOVERYfully recoveredTIME UNDER WATER80% of session · 20/25 bars
final equity 1.3184 (31.84%) · max DD -2.00% · time-under-water 20/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +13 / −5 (68% positive) · μ=19.15 · σ=41.34PROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 67.39 (+1.17σ vs μ)76.4238.210.00-38.21-76.42μ = 19.15-11.42-11.4237.0037.007.307.3015.8715.8725.0125.017.307.300.000.00-76.42-76.42-55.93-55.93-15.87-15.87-15.87-15.8760.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4238.2138.2139.7339.7359.9059.9067.3967.39v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 67.386 · range [-76.42, 67.39] · μ 19.151 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=151.4406 · σ=213.2027 · range [19.1050, 660.5018] · R²=0.255 RISING +398.98%σ EXTREME 140.78%LAST 638.0701660.5018500.1526339.8034179.454219.1050μ = 151.4406max 660.5018min 19.1050dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.26μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 638.07% · range [19.10%, 660.50%] · μ 151.44% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +5 / −14 (26% positive) · μ=-0.162 · σ=0.273MEAN-REVERSIONLAST 0.227 (+1.42σ vs μ)0.5830.2920.000-0.292-0.583μ = -0.162-0.583-0.583-0.031-0.0310.0570.057-0.023-0.023-0.043-0.0430.0280.028-0.136-0.136-0.433-0.433-0.357-0.357-0.075-0.0750.0290.029-0.333-0.333-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.333-0.333-0.233-0.233-0.036-0.0360.3750.3750.2270.227v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 0.227 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
105.1840
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
6.0776
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2982
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
1.7204
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9990
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
-1.0566
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2907
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (6 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.4355
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0619
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedstationary not rejected (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

REJECT H₀*

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
2.1109
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0348
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zoneVR 1.642 → trending
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=1.50e-3 · top T=8.00h (20.2%) · top-3 cover 53.5%2 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEScumulative energy ↗ (2 bins above 2× noise)3.6e-32.7e-31.8e-39.1e-40.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 3.39e-3 · 18.9% energyperiod 24.0 · power 3.39e-3 · 18.9% energyperiod 12.0 · power 2.58e-3 · 14.4% energyperiod 12.0 · power 2.58e-3 · 14.4% energyperiod 8.0 · power 3.63e-3 · 20.2% energyperiod 8.0 · power 3.63e-3 · 20.2% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.90e-3 · 10.6% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.90e-3 · 10.6% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.86e-3 · 10.4% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.86e-3 · 10.4% energyperiod 4.0 · power 1.97e-3 · 11.0% energyperiod 4.0 · power 1.97e-3 · 11.0% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.01e-3 · 5.6% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.01e-3 · 5.6% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.01e-4 · 3.3% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.01e-4 · 3.3% energyperiod 2.7 · power 2.65e-4 · 1.5% energyperiod 2.7 · power 2.65e-4 · 1.5% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.75e-4 · 1.0% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.75e-4 · 1.0% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.85e-4 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.85e-4 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.0 · power 2.84e-4 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.0 · power 2.84e-4 · 1.6% energy50% by T=8.0h#1 dominantT=8.00h#2T=24.00h#3T=12.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 8.00h (freq 0.125) · concentrates 20.2% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 1.796e-2

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (346 bars · effective 1753005 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 0.3 d · σ/bar 0.772pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 1.89ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0005 · n = 346n = 346
μ per bar
+0.077pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.772pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
3.78pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move0d
1.89pp
σ × √6
Terminal variancebinary
0.0005
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
100.0¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 1.19pp · ES₉₅ 1.51pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.077pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 3.45pp · unique ratio 0.02n = 346
VaR 95%
1.19pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
1.51pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
1.0pp
peak 95.5¢ → trough 94.5¢
Median step
3.45pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
100.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
1.001
total return per $1
AmericanUS
-199900
risk $199900 to win $100
FractionalUK
0.00 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$0.05
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 100.0%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.006 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.006 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
0.00 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
10.97 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
69158389231947372713053516332621338006070265876942948922798281201766159072178
NO token ID
108155899120891339335061310012730452179174899730515534240916406228586369748787
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 21:35:48 UTC
Snapshot age
9ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 21:35:48 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
83220fe94bde0bd19d6c4c7022c1ffd42f7970b98f18b89376edb034f149d40a · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Atlanta Dream vs. Toronto Tempo

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+1.000
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
+1.000
bid-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-wnba-atl-tor-2026-06-14/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00KERR
BUY$10.00KERR
BUY$100.00KERR
SELL$1.00KERR
SELL$10.00KERR
SELL$100.00KERR

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 346 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
1202.23%
σ per bar = 0.009080
Mean return (annualised)
156187.51%
μ per bar = 0.000891
Sharpe (rf=0)
129.91
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
1.05%
peak 0.95 → trough 0.94 over 50 bars

/api/asset/pm-wnba-atl-tor-2026-06-14/risk · same metrics, JSON