POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · WILL THE U.S. INVADE CUBA IN 2026?

Will the U.S. invade Cuba in 2026?

YES · live
24.5¢
NO · live
75.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-the-us-invade-cuba-in-2026 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
39.98%
max drawdown
2.04%
sharpe
ulcer index
1.55%
RMS drawdown
pain index
1.18%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
2.04%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
1.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
1.00
upside/downside
roll spread
0.0 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
550
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-the-us-invade-cuba-in-2026/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH5ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
24.5¢
NO · live
75.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.2276 · σ=0.0121 · range [0.2050, 0.2450] · R²=0.471 RISING +19.51%σ HIGH 5.31%LAST 0.24500.24500.23500.22500.21500.2050μ = 0.2276max 0.2450min 0.2050dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.47μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 24.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 24.5%NO 75.5%NO75.5%75.50¢ · odds 1/1.32
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.803 / 1.00 bits (80%) · high uncertainty
YES
24.5%24.5¢4.08× +0.00pp
NO
75.5%75.5¢1.32× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=900 · μ=37.5 · σ=68.0 · CV=1.81BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=7075150225300μ = 3730050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 900bp moved · peak 300bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
5ms
YES mid
24.50¢ (24.50%)
NO mid
75.50¢ (75.50%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$23.0k
liquidity $
$85.0k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.2276 · σ=0.0121 · range [0.2050, 0.2450] · R²=0.471 RISING +19.51%σ HIGH 5.31%LAST 0.24500.24500.23500.22500.21500.2050μ = 0.2276max 0.2450min 0.2050dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.47μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 24.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.7724 · σ=0.0121 · range [0.7550, 0.7950] · R²=0.471 FALLING -5.03%σ NORMAL 1.56%LAST 0.75500.79500.78500.77500.76500.7550μ = 0.7724max 0.7950min 0.7550dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.47μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 75.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0018 · σ=0.0070 · skew=2.24 (right-skewed) · kurt=5.65 (leptokurtic (fat tails))15118401-0.80ppbin -0.80pp · n=1 · 6.7% peakbin -0.80pp · n=1 · 6.7% peak3-0.40ppbin -0.40pp · n=3 · 20.0% peakbin -0.40pp · n=3 · 20.0% peak15-0.00ppbin -0.00pp · n=15 · 100.0% peakbin -0.00pp · n=15 · 100.0% peak10.40ppbin 0.40pp · n=1 · 6.7% peakbin 0.40pp · n=1 · 6.7% peak10.80ppbin 0.80pp · n=1 · 6.7% peakbin 0.80pp · n=1 · 6.7% peak21.20ppbin 1.20pp · n=2 · 13.3% peakbin 1.20pp · n=2 · 13.3% peak1.60pp2.00pp2.40pp12.80ppbin 2.80pp · n=1 · 6.7% peakbin 2.80pp · n=1 · 6.7% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=2.21 · kurt=6.23 · near 9 / mid 14 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.85 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSMILDLY HEAVY UPPERLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+1.76σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25PLATYKURTIC · THIN TAILS (G₂=-1.13)
μ MEAN22.76¢95% CI: [22.29¢, 23.23¢]
σ STD DEV1.21ppσ² = 1.461 · CV = 5.31%
med MEDIAN23.00¢Q₁ 21.50¢ · Q₃ 23.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 20.50¢Q₁ 21.50¢med 23.00¢Q₃ 23.50¢max 24.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁-0.321approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-1.133platykurtic · thin tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ < med · left-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.20
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRconsistent with normalratio = 0.82
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.31
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ADF rejects unit root
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.071within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.008lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT1.149strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+4.524significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 1.149STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.071k=2+0.008k=3+0.019k=4-0.127k=5-0.2420+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ADF rejects unit rootfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=4.52)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID1107878
SLUGwill-the-us-invade-cuba-in-2026
CATEGORYWill the U.S. invade Cuba in 2026?
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES24.50¢implied prob 24.50% · decimal odds 4.08×
COUNTER · NO75.50¢implied prob 75.50% · decimal odds 1.32×
24.50¢
75.50¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME23.02k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY84.95k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (76¢)|primary − counter| = 0.510 · entropy 0.803 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 24.5%NO 75.5%YES24.5%H = 0.803 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES4.08×(25¢)NO1.32×(76¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.803 bits (80% of max) · high uncertainty
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · DISTANTresolves 2026-12-31 00:00 UTC
198days
15hrs
23min
YES$1.00(P = 24.5%)
NO$0.00(P = 75.5%)
current: $0.2450 · expected return per side: $0.76 on YES hit · $0.24 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+99.3dRESOLVESP projection · σ=1.21% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 5.921 pp/day
now198.64d left
5.921 pp/day×1.00
−25%148.98d left
6.837 pp/day×1.15
−50%99.32d left
8.374 pp/day×1.41
−75%49.66d left
11.842 pp/day×2.00
−90%19.86d left
18.724 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 3.00% · worst -1.00% · typical |Δ| 0.38%MILD BULLISH +4.00%BEST+3.00%2hWORST-1.00%7hTYPICAL |Δ|0.38%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+4.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.14% · Σ +1.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.25% · Σ +2.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.13% · Σ +1.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +4.00%+4.00%0.00%0.00% · 1h0.00% · 1h·1h3.00% · 2h3.00% · 2h3.00%2h★ BEST0.00% · 3h0.00% · 3h·3h-0.50% · 4h-0.50% · 4h-0.50%4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h-0.50% · 6h-0.50% · 6h-0.50%6h-1.00% · 7h-1.00% · 7h-1.00%7h▼ WORST0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h1.00% · 13h1.00% · 13h1.00%13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h1.00% · 15h1.00% · 15h1.00%15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h0.00% · 18h0.00% · 18h·18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h1.00% · 21h1.00% · 21h1.00%21h-0.50% · 22h-0.50% · 22h-0.50%22h0.50% · 23h0.50% · 23h0.50%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNEurope-led (+2.00%)RUNSup max 1 · down max 2BREADTH21% up · 17% down · 63% flat
5 up bars · 4 down · best 3.00% · worst -1.00% · typical |Δ| 0.375%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsSTRONG PROFIT +4.01% · SHALLOW DDFINAL+4.01%MAX DD-1.99%RECOVERYONGOING · 17 barsMAX RUN-UP+4.01%UNDERWATER20/25 (80%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.0401 · peak 1.0401 · range [1.0000, 1.0401]1.04011.0000break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0401UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -1.99% · moderate0%-1.99%▼ TROUGH -1.99%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 2 total#1 -1.99%bar 5-21 · 17 bars · recovered#2 -0.50%bar 23-25 · 3 bars · ONGOINGDD SEVERITYmoderate (max -1.99%)RECOVERYongoing · 21 barsTIME UNDER WATER80% of session · 20/25 bars
final equity 1.0401 (4.01%) · max DD -1.99% · time-under-water 20/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +14 / −5 (74% positive) · μ=12.65 · σ=47.73PROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 30.21 (+0.37σ vs μ)76.4238.210.00-38.21-76.42μ = 12.6523.4723.4710.8510.85-76.42-76.42-76.42-76.42-55.93-55.93-55.93-55.93-38.21-38.2138.2138.2138.2138.2160.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4238.2138.2138.2138.2138.2138.2115.8715.8730.2130.2130.2130.21v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 30.208 · range [-76.42, 60.42] · μ 12.653 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=51.5234 · σ=27.9091 · range [38.2099, 134.5511] · R²=0.201 FALLING -61.15%σ EXTREME 54.17%LAST 48.3322134.5511110.465886.380562.295238.2099μ = 51.5234max 134.5511min 38.2099dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.20μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 48.33% · range [38.21%, 134.55%] · μ 51.52% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +3 / −16 (16% positive) · μ=-0.237 · σ=0.269MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.708 (-1.75σ vs μ)0.7080.3540.000-0.354-0.708μ = -0.237-0.107-0.1070.0620.062-0.333-0.333-0.133-0.1330.0710.0710.2140.214-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.233-0.233-0.333-0.333-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.333-0.333-0.233-0.233-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.489-0.489-0.646-0.646-0.708-0.708v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.708 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
87.1171
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
2.5705
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.7681
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-1.9018
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3420
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
-0.3213
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.7480
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (5 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.5835
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0241
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-0.6799
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4966
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.793 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=5.57e-5 · top T=2.67h (22.2%) · top-3 cover 52.3%2 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEScumulative energy ↗ (2 bins above 2× noise)1.5e-41.1e-47.4e-53.7e-50.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 2.78e-5 · 4.2% energyperiod 24.0 · power 2.78e-5 · 4.2% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.19e-4 · 17.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.19e-4 · 17.8% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.21e-5 · 3.3% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.21e-5 · 3.3% energyperiod 6.0 · power 8.23e-5 · 12.3% energyperiod 6.0 · power 8.23e-5 · 12.3% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.84e-5 · 2.8% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.84e-5 · 2.8% energyperiod 4.0 · power 3.54e-5 · 5.3% energyperiod 4.0 · power 3.54e-5 · 5.3% energyperiod 3.4 · power 6.03e-5 · 9.0% energyperiod 3.4 · power 6.03e-5 · 9.0% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.35e-5 · 9.5% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.35e-5 · 9.5% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.49e-4 · 22.2% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.49e-4 · 22.2% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.43e-5 · 2.1% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.43e-5 · 2.1% energyperiod 2.2 · power 7.26e-5 · 10.9% energyperiod 2.2 · power 7.26e-5 · 10.9% energyperiod 2.0 · power 4.17e-6 · 0.6% energyperiod 2.0 · power 4.17e-6 · 0.6% energy50% by T=3.4h#1 dominantT=2.67h#2T=12.00h#3T=6.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.67h (freq 0.375) · concentrates 22.2% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 6.688e-4

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (550 bars · effective 1753200 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 198.6 d · σ/bar 0.030pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 2.09ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.1850 · n = 550n = 550
μ per bar
+0.000pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.030pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.15pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move199d
2.09pp
σ × √4767.393724166666
Terminal variancebinary
0.1850
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
24.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.05pp · ES₉₅ 0.06pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.000pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.50pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 550
VaR 95%
0.05pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.06pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
2.0pp
peak 24.5¢ → trough 24.0¢
Median step
0.50pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
24.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
4.082
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+308
$100 wins $308
FractionalUK
3.08 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$308.16
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 24.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.803 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.803 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
2.03 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.41 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
1291454874125024564913411658636854434792972068510027777552181749936579562639
NO token ID
46036307473347147486878725188057240439237346445231099615680388314304154599904
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-15 08:36:22 UTC
Snapshot age
5ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-15 08:36:22 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
4407a4889810c084e643bd0809fa0e42ac4704d687997f944f4fef282fc7046f · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Will the U.S. invade Cuba in 2026?

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.245000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
408.2bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.027
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.186
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-the-us-invade-cuba-in-2026/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.256122453.95bp0.2600002FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.259887607.64bp0.2700003FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.61781015216.75bp0.92000068FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.230058609.90bp0.2300002FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.1780132734.15bp0.09000016FILLED
SELL$100.00K0.0593677576.86bp0.01000024PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 550 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
164.94%
σ per bar = 0.001246
Mean return (annualised)
-0.00%
μ per bar = -0.000000
Sharpe (rf=0)
-0.00
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
2.04%
peak 0.24 → trough 0.24 over 133 bars

/api/asset/pm-will-the-us-invade-cuba-in-2026/risk · same metrics, JSON