POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · POLITICS

Will Robert Kenyon win the 2026 Makerfield by-election?

YES · live
26.5¢
NO · live
73.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-robert-kenyon-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election · fresh · feed 17s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
29.60%
max drawdown
3.64%
sharpe
ulcer index
1.23%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.42%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
3.64%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
0.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
0.00
upside/downside
roll spread
0.4 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-robert-kenyon-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCWARMING17.4s--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC WARMING·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC WARMING·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
26.5¢
NO · live
73.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.2628 · σ=0.0171 · range [0.2350, 0.2850] · R²=0.561 RISING +12.77%σ HIGH 6.50%LAST 0.26500.28500.27250.26000.24750.2350μ = 0.2628max 0.2850min 0.2350dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.56μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 26.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 26.5%NO 73.5%NO73.5%73.50¢ · odds 1/1.36
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.834 / 1.00 bits (83%) · high uncertainty
YES
26.5%26.5¢3.77× +0.00pp
NO
73.5%73.5¢1.36× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=900 · μ=37.5 · σ=86.3 · CV=2.30BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=100100200300400μ = 3740050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 900bp moved · peak 400bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
17.4s
YES mid
26.50¢ (26.50%)
NO mid
73.50¢ (73.50%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$197.6k
liquidity $
$136.0k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.2628 · σ=0.0171 · range [0.2350, 0.2850] · R²=0.561 RISING +12.77%σ HIGH 6.50%LAST 0.26500.28500.27250.26000.24750.2350μ = 0.2628max 0.2850min 0.2350dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.56μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 26.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.7372 · σ=0.0171 · range [0.7150, 0.7650] · R²=0.561 FALLING -3.92%σ NORMAL 2.32%LAST 0.73500.76500.75250.74000.72750.7150μ = 0.7372max 0.7650min 0.7150dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.56μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 73.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0035 · σ=0.0083 · skew=2.74 (right-skewed) · kurt=9.14 (leptokurtic (fat tails))17139402-0.75ppbin -0.75pp · n=2 · 11.8% peakbin -0.75pp · n=2 · 11.8% peak2-0.25ppbin -0.25pp · n=2 · 11.8% peakbin -0.25pp · n=2 · 11.8% peak170.25ppbin 0.25pp · n=17 · 100.0% peakbin 0.25pp · n=17 · 100.0% peak0.75pp21.25ppbin 1.25pp · n=2 · 11.8% peakbin 1.25pp · n=2 · 11.8% peak1.75pp2.25pp2.75pp3.25pp13.75ppbin 3.75pp · n=1 · 5.9% peakbin 3.75pp · n=1 · 5.9% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=3.05 · kurt=10.64 · near 6 / mid 15 / far 3 · OLS slope=0.75 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALTHIN LOWER TAIL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+2.19σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25PLATYKURTIC · THIN TAILS (G₂=-1.36)
μ MEAN26.28¢95% CI: [25.61¢, 26.95¢]
σ STD DEV1.71ppσ² = 2.918 · CV = 6.50%
med MEDIAN27.50¢Q₁ 24.50¢ · Q₃ 27.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 23.50¢Q₁ 24.50¢med 27.50¢Q₃ 27.50¢max 28.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁-0.474approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-1.358platykurtic · thin tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ < med · left-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.71
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 0.77
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 2.93
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.21 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.206within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.076lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.765strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+5.421significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.765STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.206k=2-0.076k=3-0.151k=4+0.202k=5-0.0720+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.21 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.73very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=5.42)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2262262
SLUGwill-robert-kenyon-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election
CATEGORYPolitics
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES26.50¢implied prob 26.50% · decimal odds 3.77×
COUNTER · NO73.50¢implied prob 73.50% · decimal odds 1.36×
26.50¢
73.50¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME197.62k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY136.02k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (74¢)|primary − counter| = 0.470 · entropy 0.834 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHDEEP100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 26.5%NO 73.5%YES26.5%H = 0.834 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES3.77×(27¢)NO1.36×(74¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.834 bits (83% of max) · high uncertainty
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 4.00% · worst -1.00% · typical |Δ| 0.37%MILD BULLISH +3.00%BEST+4.00%10hWORST-1.00%9hTYPICAL |Δ|0.37%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+3.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.29% · Σ +2.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.25% · Σ +2.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ -0.13% · Σ -1.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +3.00%+5.00%0.00%0.00% · 1h0.00% · 1h·1h0.00% · 2h0.00% · 2h·2h0.00% · 3h0.00% · 3h·3h1.00% · 4h1.00% · 4h1.00%4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h1.00% · 6h1.00% · 6h1.00%6h0.00% · 7h0.00% · 7h·7h0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h-1.00% · 9h-1.00% · 9h-1.00%9h▼ WORST4.00% · 10h4.00% · 10h4.00%10h★ BEST0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h-0.50% · 12h-0.50% · 12h-0.50%12h-0.50% · 13h-0.50% · 13h-0.50%13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.00% · 15h0.00% · 15h·15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h0.00% · 18h0.00% · 18h·18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h-1.00% · 23h-1.00% · 23h-1.00%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+-1.00%)RUNSup max 1 · down max 2BREADTH13% up · 17% down · 71% flat
3 up bars · 4 down · best 4.00% · worst -1.00% · typical |Δ| 0.375%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsSTRONG PROFIT +2.94% · SHALLOW DDFINAL+2.94%MAX DD-1.99%RECOVERYONGOING · 13 barsMAX RUN-UP+5.03%UNDERWATER14/25 (56%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.0294 · peak 1.0503 · range [1.0000, 1.0503]1.05031.0000break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0503UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -1.99% · moderate0%-1.99%▼ TROUGH -1.99%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 2 total#1 -1.99%bar 13-25 · 13 bars · ONGOING#2 -1.00%bar 10-10 · 1 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYmoderate (max -1.99%)RECOVERYongoing · 13 barsTIME UNDER WATER56% of session · 14/25 bars
final equity 1.0294 (2.94%) · max DD -1.99% · time-under-water 14/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +10 / −5 (53% positive) · μ=6.34 · σ=38.45MIXED EDGELAST -38.21 (-1.16σ vs μ)60.4230.210.00-30.21-60.42μ = 6.3460.4260.4260.4260.4260.4260.4220.7220.7235.6335.6335.6335.6321.6621.6617.0017.0017.0017.0027.0227.02-60.42-60.42-60.42-60.42-38.21-38.210.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -38.210 · range [-60.42, 60.42] · μ 6.340 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=71.6423 · σ=69.2396 · range [0.0000, 171.7323] · R²=0.221 FALLING -20.94%σ EXTREME 96.65%LAST 38.2099171.7323128.799385.866242.93310.0000μ = 71.6423max 171.7323min 0.0000dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.22μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 38.21% · range [0.00%, 171.73%] · μ 71.64% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +3 / −12 (16% positive) · μ=-0.151 · σ=0.254MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.233 (-0.33σ vs μ)0.5830.2920.000-0.292-0.583μ = -0.151-0.333-0.333-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.069-0.069-0.290-0.290-0.420-0.420-0.335-0.335-0.279-0.279-0.289-0.2890.0330.0330.1670.1670.4170.417-0.033-0.0330.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000-0.033-0.033-0.233-0.233v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.233 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
225.6628
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
3.4363
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.6356
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-1.8956
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3450
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
-0.3638
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.7160
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (4 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.6575
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0174
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-0.9640
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3350
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.707 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=9.50e-5 · top T=2.00h (23.4%) · top-3 cover 45.2%1 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEcumulative energy ↗ (1 bin above 2× noise)2.7e-42.0e-41.3e-46.7e-50.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 7.33e-5 · 6.4% energyperiod 24.0 · power 7.33e-5 · 6.4% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.46e-5 · 1.3% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.46e-5 · 1.3% energyperiod 8.0 · power 5.70e-5 · 5.0% energyperiod 8.0 · power 5.70e-5 · 5.0% energyperiod 6.0 · power 7.60e-5 · 6.7% energyperiod 6.0 · power 7.60e-5 · 6.7% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.32e-4 · 11.5% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.32e-4 · 11.5% energyperiod 4.0 · power 8.54e-5 · 7.5% energyperiod 4.0 · power 8.54e-5 · 7.5% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.17e-4 · 10.3% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.17e-4 · 10.3% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.16e-4 · 10.1% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.16e-4 · 10.1% energyperiod 2.7 · power 3.05e-5 · 2.7% energyperiod 2.7 · power 3.05e-5 · 2.7% energyperiod 2.4 · power 6.87e-5 · 6.0% energyperiod 2.4 · power 6.87e-5 · 6.0% energyperiod 2.2 · power 1.03e-4 · 9.0% energyperiod 2.2 · power 1.03e-4 · 9.0% energyperiod 2.0 · power 2.67e-4 · 23.4% energyperiod 2.0 · power 2.67e-4 · 23.4% energy50% by T=3.0h#1 dominantT=2.00h#2T=4.80h#3T=3.43hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.00h (freq 0.500) · concentrates 23.4% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 1.140e-3

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (3067 bars · effective 1752810 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 7.0 d · σ/bar 0.078pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 1.01ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.1948 · n = 3067n = 3067
μ per bar
+0.000pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.078pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.38pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move7d
1.01pp
σ × √168
Terminal variancebinary
0.1948
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
26.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.13pp · ES₉₅ 0.16pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.000pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 1.00pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 3067
VaR 95%
0.13pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.16pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
7.0pp
peak 28.5¢ → trough 26.5¢
Median step
1.00pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
26.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
3.774
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+277
$100 wins $277
FractionalUK
2.77 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$277.36
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 26.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.834 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.834 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
1.92 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.44 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
32749652958490459738077534958372321998219313230738592738299008092673106086919
NO token ID
69647131137181263161209582692292085273656986396122522741327860094193790245800
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 12:25:20 UTC
Snapshot age
17.4s
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 12:25:38 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
480638b8225e822232730cd79983f49357117556bef19c39437af1e80cbd1d50 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Politics

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.265000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
377.4bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.458
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.294
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-robert-kenyon-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.270000188.68bp0.2700001FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.276397430.09bp0.2800002FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.4801238117.83bp0.89000031FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.260000188.68bp0.2600001FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.247121674.70bp0.2300004FILLED
SELL$100.00K0.1167165595.63bp0.01000021PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 3,067 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
389.15%
σ per bar = 0.002939
Mean return (annualised)
2199.09%
μ per bar = 0.000013
Sharpe (rf=0)
5.65
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
7.02%
peak 0.28 → trough 0.27 over 2545 bars

/api/asset/pm-will-robert-kenyon-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election/risk · same metrics, JSON