POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · POLITICS

Will Rebecca Shepherd win the 2026 Makerfield by-election?

YES · live
1.6¢
NO · live
98.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-rebecca-shepherd-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts -20.51%
realized vol (ann.)
18.61%
max drawdown
14.81%
sharpe
ulcer index
8.24%
RMS drawdown
pain index
5.85%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
14.81%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
1.42
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
1.42
upside/downside
roll spread
2.7 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
-20.51%
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 25%
  • 24h change -20.51%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-rebecca-shepherd-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH4ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
1.6¢
NO · live
98.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.0154 · σ=0.0023 · range [0.0110, 0.0195] · R²=0.040 FLATσ EXTREME 15.20%LAST 0.01550.01950.01740.01520.01310.0110μ = 0.0154max 0.0195min 0.0110dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.04μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 1.55¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 1.6%NO 98.5%NO98.5%98.45¢ · odds 1/1.02
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.115 / 1.00 bits (12%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
1.6%1.6¢64.52× +0.00pp
NO
98.5%98.5¢1.02× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=400 · μ=16.7 · σ=16.9 · CV=1.01BURSTYcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=8014284155μ = 175550%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 400bp moved · peak 55bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
4ms
YES mid
1.55¢ (1.55%)
NO mid
98.45¢ (98.45%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$444.2k
liquidity $
$1.2M
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.0154 · σ=0.0023 · range [0.0110, 0.0195] · R²=0.040 FLATσ EXTREME 15.20%LAST 0.01550.01950.01740.01520.01310.0110μ = 0.0154max 0.0195min 0.0110dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.04μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 1.55¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.9846 · σ=0.0023 · range [0.9805, 0.9890] · R²=0.040 FLATσ LOW 0.24%LAST 0.98450.98900.98690.98480.98260.9805μ = 0.9846max 0.9890min 0.9805dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.04μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 98.45¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=-0.0000 · σ=0.0023 · skew=0.57 (right-skewed) · kurt=0.05 (mesokurtic)754201-0.45ppbin -0.45pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin -0.45pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak1-0.34ppbin -0.34pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin -0.34pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak2-0.24ppbin -0.24pp · n=2 · 28.6% peakbin -0.24pp · n=2 · 28.6% peak5-0.13ppbin -0.13pp · n=5 · 71.4% peakbin -0.13pp · n=5 · 71.4% peak7-0.03ppbin -0.03pp · n=7 · 100.0% peakbin -0.03pp · n=7 · 100.0% peak30.08ppbin 0.08pp · n=3 · 42.9% peakbin 0.08pp · n=3 · 42.9% peak10.18ppbin 0.18pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin 0.18pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak10.29ppbin 0.29pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin 0.29pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak10.39ppbin 0.39pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin 0.39pp · n=1 · 14.3% peak20.50ppbin 0.50pp · n=2 · 28.6% peakbin 0.50pp · n=2 · 28.6% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=0.45 · kurt=0.40 · near 18 / mid 6 / far 0 · OLS slope=1.00 intercept=-0.00MATCHES NORMAL · WELL-BEHAVEDMILDLY HEAVY UPPERLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25PLATYKURTIC · THIN TAILS (G₂=-1.01)
μ MEAN1.54¢95% CI: [1.45¢, 1.63¢]
σ STD DEV0.23ppσ² = 0.055 · CV = 15.20%
med MEDIAN1.55¢Q₁ 1.35¢ · Q₃ 1.70¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 1.10¢Q₁ 1.35¢med 1.55¢Q₃ 1.70¢max 1.95¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁-0.106approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-1.009platykurtic · thin tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ median≈ equal · symmetric|μ−med| / σ = 0.04
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRconsistent with normalratio = 0.90
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.63
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.43 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.434negative · reversal
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.087lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.643persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT-0.983fails 5% test
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.643PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.434k=2+0.087k=3+0.027k=4-0.112k=5+0.0970+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.43 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.72very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCENOT SIGNIFICANT (|t|=0.98)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2262267
SLUGwill-rebecca-she…-by-election
CATEGORYPolitics
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES1.55¢implied prob 1.55% · decimal odds 64.52×
COUNTER · NO98.45¢implied prob 98.45% · decimal odds 1.02×
1.55¢
98.45¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME444.23k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY1.22M USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (98¢)|primary − counter| = 0.969 · entropy 0.115 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHDEEP100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 1.6%NO 98.5%YES1.6%H = 0.115 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES64.52×(2¢)NO1.02×(98¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.115 bits (12% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 0.55% · worst -0.50% · typical |Δ| 0.17%MIXED · 8 UP / 11 DNBEST+0.55%17hWORST-0.50%6hTYPICAL |Δ|0.17%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+0.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.01% · Σ +0.10%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.04% · Σ -0.30%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.03% · Σ +0.20%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +0.00%+0.40%-0.45%0.40% · 1h0.40% · 1h0.40%1h-0.10% · 2h-0.10% · 2h-0.10%2h0.05% · 3h0.05% · 3h0.05%3h-0.05% · 4h-0.05% · 4h-0.05%4h-0.15% · 5h-0.15% · 5h-0.15%5h-0.50% · 6h-0.50% · 6h-0.50%6h▼ WORST0.45% · 7h0.45% · 7h0.45%7h-0.35% · 8h-0.35% · 8h-0.35%8h0.15% · 9h0.15% · 9h0.15%9h-0.10% · 10h-0.10% · 10h-0.10%10h-0.20% · 11h-0.20% · 11h-0.20%11h0.25% · 12h0.25% · 12h0.25%12h-0.05% · 13h-0.05% · 13h-0.05%13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.00% · 15h0.00% · 15h·15h-0.25% · 16h-0.25% · 16h-0.25%16h0.55% · 17h0.55% · 17h0.55%17h★ BEST0.05% · 18h0.05% · 18h0.05%18h-0.10% · 19h-0.10% · 19h-0.10%19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.10% · 21h0.10% · 21h0.10%21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h-0.15% · 23h-0.15% · 23h-0.15%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+0.20%)RUNSup max 2 · down max 3BREADTH33% up · 46% down · 21% flat
8 up bars · 11 down · best 0.55% · worst -0.50% · typical |Δ| 0.167%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsFLAT · NO MATERIAL MOVEMENTFINAL-0.01%MAX DD-0.85%RECOVERYONGOING · 23 barsMAX RUN-UP+0.40%UNDERWATER23/25 (92%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 0.9999 · peak 1.0040 · range [0.9955, 1.0040]1.00400.9955break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0040UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -0.85% · shallow0%-0.85%▼ TROUGH -0.85%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 1 total#1 -0.85%bar 3-25 · 23 bars · ONGOINGDD SEVERITYshallow (max -0.85%)RECOVERYongoing · 23 barsTIME UNDER WATER92% of session · 23/25 bars
final equity 0.9999 (-0.01%) · max DD -0.85% · time-under-water 23/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +8 / −11 (42% positive) · μ=-3.91 · σ=21.38MIXED EDGELAST -26.58 (-1.06σ vs μ)40.6620.330.00-20.33-40.66μ = -3.91-18.68-18.68-15.18-15.18-25.82-25.82-20.46-20.46-22.74-22.74-24.83-24.8310.3610.36-21.14-21.144.714.71-10.36-10.36-22.00-22.0027.9927.9917.5617.5614.3914.3914.3914.3920.1520.1540.6640.66-16.76-16.76-26.58-26.58v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -26.579 · range [-26.58, 40.66] · μ -3.912 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=23.3973 · σ=7.5718 · range [8.2395, 32.3433] · R²=0.425 FALLING -69.88%σ EXTREME 32.36%LAST 8.239532.343326.317420.291414.26558.2395μ = 23.3973max 32.3433min 8.2395dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.43μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 8.24% · range [8.24%, 32.34%] · μ 23.40% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +2 / −17 (11% positive) · μ=-0.373 · σ=0.223MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.048 (+1.46σ vs μ)0.7110.3560.000-0.356-0.711μ = -0.3730.0400.040-0.389-0.389-0.605-0.605-0.678-0.678-0.685-0.685-0.711-0.711-0.528-0.528-0.439-0.439-0.414-0.414-0.377-0.377-0.356-0.356-0.340-0.340-0.359-0.359-0.358-0.358-0.346-0.346-0.402-0.4020.0280.028-0.122-0.122-0.048-0.048v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.048 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
ALL TESTS PASS · data behaves as nominal0 reject·6 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
1.5745
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4551
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainednormality not rejected
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
6.0356
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3022
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-2.7150
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0750
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
1.8121
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0700
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (14 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.2213
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3195
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedstationary not rejected (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-1.8196
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0688
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.446 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=6.27e-6 · top T=2.00h (24.4%) · top-3 cover 61.3%2 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEScumulative energy ↗ (2 bins above 2× noise)1.8e-51.4e-59.2e-64.6e-60.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 2.49e-6 · 3.3% energyperiod 24.0 · power 2.49e-6 · 3.3% energyperiod 12.0 · power 5.15e-7 · 0.7% energyperiod 12.0 · power 5.15e-7 · 0.7% energyperiod 8.0 · power 3.53e-6 · 4.7% energyperiod 8.0 · power 3.53e-6 · 4.7% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.50e-6 · 2.0% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.50e-6 · 2.0% energyperiod 4.8 · power 4.87e-6 · 6.5% energyperiod 4.8 · power 4.87e-6 · 6.5% energyperiod 4.0 · power 4.02e-6 · 5.3% energyperiod 4.0 · power 4.02e-6 · 5.3% energyperiod 3.4 · power 7.72e-6 · 10.3% energyperiod 3.4 · power 7.72e-6 · 10.3% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.62e-6 · 2.2% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.62e-6 · 2.2% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.73e-5 · 23.1% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.73e-5 · 23.1% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.04e-5 · 13.8% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.04e-5 · 13.8% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.80e-6 · 3.7% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.80e-6 · 3.7% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.84e-5 · 24.4% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.84e-5 · 24.4% energy50% by T=2.7h#1 dominantT=2.00h#2T=2.67h#3T=2.40hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.00h (freq 0.500) · concentrates 24.4% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 7.519e-5

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (3825 bars · effective 1752908 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 7.0 d · σ/bar 0.019pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.24ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0153 · n = 3825n = 3825
μ per bar
-0.000pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.019pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.09pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move7d
0.24pp
σ × √168
Terminal variancebinary
0.0153
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
1.6¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.03pp · ES₉₅ 0.04pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift -0.000pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.05pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 3825
VaR 95%
0.03pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.04pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
46.2pp
peak 1.9¢ → trough 1.1¢
Median step
0.05pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
1.6%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
64.516
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+6352
$100 wins $6352
FractionalUK
63.52 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$6351.61
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 1.6%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.115 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.115 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
6.01 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.02 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
32605480710229459496814068809521535528500860730244041769252795555668751623653
NO token ID
99124197360263115356180485758906225193712536154336191636725841881851359643673
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 16:08:44 UTC
Snapshot age
4ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 16:08:44 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
b5eca956ed26df565d1719a29776b2f95623e9d2281d49b253a5d76097cff7a0 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Politics

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.015500
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
645.2bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.758
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.786
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-rebecca-shepherd-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.0195692625.40bp0.0200004FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.0199562874.89bp0.0200004FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.07719439802.28bp0.80000079FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.0114032643.25bp0.0070007FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.0046417005.95bp0.00100013PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.0046417005.95bp0.00100013PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 3,825 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
1724.88%
σ per bar = 0.013028
Mean return (annualised)
-10523.61%
μ per bar = -0.000060
Sharpe (rf=0)
-6.10
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
46.15%
peak 0.02 → trough 0.01 over 444 bars

/api/asset/pm-will-rebecca-shepherd-win-the-2026-makerfield-by-election/risk · same metrics, JSON