POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · VALORANT MASTERS LONDON 2026: WINNER
Will EDward Gaming win Valorant Masters London 2026?
8.0¢
92.0¢
▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle
polymarket · will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026 · fresh · feed 0s old24h sparkline · 60 pts▼ —
realized vol (ann.)
0.00%
max drawdown
0.00%
sharpe
—
ulcer index
0.00%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.00%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
—
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
0.00%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
—
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
—
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
1.00
upside/downside
roll spread
0.0 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
—
24h Δ
—
flow lean
—
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API:
/api/m2m/pm-will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026/bundle · venue execution: polymarket →LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH⏱--:--:-- UTCNEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
8.0¢
NO · live
92.0¢
25 ticks · last 7.95¢
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.400 / 1.00 bits (40%) · informative — one side favoured
YES8.0%8.0¢12.58×▬ +0.00pp
NO92.0%92.0¢1.09×▬ +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Σ 1045bp moved · peak 385bp · n=24 ticks
8ms
7.95¢ (7.95%)
92.05¢ (92.05%)
100.00%
0.000pp
$62.8k
$39.1k
25 ticks (live)
§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 7.95¢
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 92.05¢
§2 · Distribution of Δp
n=24
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.
§3 · Sample moments
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=8.83)
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
SKEWNESS · G₁-2.939left-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂8.829leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.
§5 · Time-series structure
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.35 + ADF rejected
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.763STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent0.45
mean-reverting0.5
random walk0.55
persistent1
strongly trending
anti-persistent0.45
mean-reverting0.5
random walk0.55
persistent1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.
§6 · Microstructure
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
TWO-SIDED PRICING
7.95¢
92.05¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.
§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis
FAIR MARKET · no edge
Probability scale (YES)
Implied decimal odds
YES12.58×(8¢)NO1.09×(92¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.400 bits (40% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.
§8 · Time decay & θ projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-21 00:00 UTC
6days
10hrs
23min
YES →$1.00
NO →$0.00
current: $0.0795 · expected return per side: $0.92 on YES hit · $0.08 on NO hit
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 6.398 pp/day
now6.43d left6.398 pp/day×1.00
−25%4.82d left7.388 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.22d left9.048 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.61d left12.796 pp/day×2.00
−90%15.44h left20.232 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.
§9 · Hourly return heatmap
7 up bars · 4 down · best 3.85% · worst -3.50% · typical |Δ| 0.435%
§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown
final equity 1.0233 (2.33%) · max DD -3.50% · time-under-water 18/25 bars
§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)
latest 0.000 · range [0.00, 57.65] · μ 19.044 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
latest 0.00% · range [0.00%, 223.25%] · μ 30.05% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
latest 0.000 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk
§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)
3 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence3 reject·3 pass·α = 0.05
Jarque-Bera
REJECT H₀***H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)
STATISTIC
90.8860
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
Ljung-Box(h=5)
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5
STATISTIC
4.7786
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4444
Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)
STATISTIC
-2.5125
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1169
Wald-Wolfowitz runs
FAIL TO REJECTnsH₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random
STATISTIC
1.3229
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1859
KPSS (μ stationarity)
REJECT H₀*H₀: p IS level-stationary
STATISTIC
0.5322
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0344
Variance ratio q=3
REJECT H₀*H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1
STATISTIC
-2.1871
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0287
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).
§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)
dominant period ≈ 2.00h (freq 0.500) · concentrates 15.8% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 1.580e-3
▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (3320 bars · effective 1752810 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.
§14 · Honest position analytics
A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →
§15 · Horizon returns
Horizon 6.4 d · σ/bar 0.005pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.06ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0732 · n = 3320✓ n = 3320
μ per bar
+0.000pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.005pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.03pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move6d
0.06pp
σ × √154.38977472222223
Terminal variancebinary
0.0732
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
8.0¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.
§16 · Tail risk
VaR₉₅ 0.01pp · ES₉₅ 0.01pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.000pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.10pp · unique ratio 0.00✓ n = 3320
VaR 95%
0.01pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.01pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
1.9pp
peak 7.8¢ → trough 7.6¢
Median step
0.10pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.
§17 · Odds conversion
Implied probabilityP
8.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
12.579
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+1158
$100 wins $1158
FractionalUK
11.58 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$1157.86
clean dollar framing
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.
§18 · Binary entropy
Market entropyH(p)
0.400 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.400 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
3.65 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.12 bit
self-information
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.
§19 · Model-dependent surfaces
External model required
The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.
The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.
To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.
§∞ · Provenance & attestation
- Upstream (snapshot)
- gamma-api.polymarket.com
- Upstream (history)
- clob.polymarket.com
- YES token ID
80054126073210525879218034466600611627237064841832704029915317715907713903524- NO token ID
50876559477793340069750557376325828743957078014629898679783306797505030211577- Snapshot fetched
- 2026-06-14 13:36:36 UTC
- Snapshot age
- 8ms
- History points
- 25 CLOB mids
- Page rendered
- 2026-06-14 13:36:36 UTC
- Storage policy
- no persistence — fetched on every request
- SHA-256 attestation
f91c8d6f215c69a704ad292888249ff54210da9e6006dcf66436b0df5a6e2ec1· deterministic hash of source snapshot- Open data licence
- CC0 / public domain
§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more
HL PREDGermany94.2¢HL PREDSpain90.3¢HL PREDUruguay66.7¢POLYMARKETWill Australia win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?0¢POLYMARKETWill Scotland win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?0¢POLYMARKETUS x Iran permanent peace deal by June 15, 2026?13¢HL PERPBTC-USD perpetual$64,237.5HL PERPETH-USD perpetual$1,664.95HL PERPHYPE-USD perpetual$60.83
Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Valorant Masters London 2026: Winner
Market depth
▸ live order book · Polymarket YESDepth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.079500
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
125.8bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.776
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.943
ask-heavy top-of-book
Slippage scenarios
▸ live book walk · Polymarket YESSimulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026/slippage?size=10000&side=buy
| Side | Notional | Avg fill | Slippage | Worst fill | Levels | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUY | $1.00K | 0.080000 | 62.89bp | 0.080000 | 1 | FILLED |
| BUY | $10.00K | 0.219464 | 17605.59bp | 0.800000 | 37 | FILLED |
| BUY | $100.00K | 0.548623 | 59009.23bp | 0.999000 | 76 | PARTIAL |
| SELL | $1.00K | 0.023163 | 7086.41bp | 0.001000 | 21 | PARTIAL |
| SELL | $10.00K | 0.023163 | 7086.41bp | 0.001000 | 21 | PARTIAL |
| SELL | $100.00K | 0.023163 | 7086.41bp | 0.001000 | 21 | PARTIAL |
Risk metrics
▸ sovereign store · 3,320 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75MRealized vol (annualised)
89.30%
σ per bar = 0.000674
Mean return (annualised)
1345.59%
μ per bar = 0.000008
Sharpe (rf=0)
15.07
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
1.94%
peak 0.08 → trough 0.08 over 27 bars
/api/asset/pm-will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026/risk · same metrics, JSON