POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · MIAMI MARLINS VS. PITTSBURGH PIRATES

Miami Marlins vs. Pittsburgh Pirates

YES · live
40.5¢
NO · live
59.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · mlb-mia-pit-2026-06-14 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
38.40%
max drawdown
0.00%
sharpe
ulcer index
0.00%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.00%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
0.00%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
upside/downside
roll spread
0.4 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
1189
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-mlb-mia-pit-2026-06-14/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH11ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
40.5¢
NO · live
59.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.4114 · σ=0.0085 · range [0.3950, 0.4250] · R²=0.794 FALLING -4.71%σ NORMAL 2.06%LAST 0.40500.42500.41750.41000.40250.3950μ = 0.4114max 0.4250min 0.3950dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.79μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 40.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 40.5%NO 59.5%NO59.5%59.50¢ · odds 1/1.68
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.974 / 1.00 bits (97%) · max uncertainty (~50/50)
YES
40.5%40.5¢2.47× +0.00pp
NO
59.5%59.5¢1.68× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=400 · μ=16.7 · σ=35.1 · CV=2.11BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=180255075100μ = 1710050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 400bp moved · peak 100bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
11ms
YES mid
40.50¢ (40.50%)
NO mid
59.50¢ (59.50%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$63.2k
liquidity $
$158.0k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.4114 · σ=0.0085 · range [0.3950, 0.4250] · R²=0.794 FALLING -4.71%σ NORMAL 2.06%LAST 0.40500.42500.41750.41000.40250.3950μ = 0.4114max 0.4250min 0.3950dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.79μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 40.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.5886 · σ=0.0085 · range [0.5750, 0.6050] · R²=0.794 RISING +3.48%σ NORMAL 1.44%LAST 0.59500.60500.59750.59000.58250.5750μ = 0.5886max 0.6050min 0.5750dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.79μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 59.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0000 · σ=0.0036 · skew=-0.85 (left-skewed) · kurt=2.17 (leptokurtic (fat tails))191410502-0.90ppbin -0.90pp · n=2 · 10.5% peakbin -0.90pp · n=2 · 10.5% peak-0.70pp2-0.50ppbin -0.50pp · n=2 · 10.5% peakbin -0.50pp · n=2 · 10.5% peak-0.30pp-0.10pp190.10ppbin 0.10pp · n=19 · 100.0% peakbin 0.10pp · n=19 · 100.0% peak0.30pp0.50pp0.70pp10.90ppbin 0.90pp · n=1 · 5.3% peakbin 0.90pp · n=1 · 5.3% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-0.32 · kurt=3.16 · near 8 / mid 13 / far 3 · OLS slope=0.80 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSTHIN UPPER TAILMILDLY HEAVY LOWER-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25PLATYKURTIC · THIN TAILS (G₂=-1.13)
μ MEAN41.14¢95% CI: [40.81¢, 41.47¢]
σ STD DEV0.85ppσ² = 0.719 · CV = 2.06%
med MEDIAN40.50¢Q₁ 40.50¢ · Q₃ 41.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 39.50¢Q₁ 40.50¢med 40.50¢Q₃ 41.50¢max 42.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁0.266approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-1.134platykurtic · thin tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.75
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRconsistent with normalratio = 1.14
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.54
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.35 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.352within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.021lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.857strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT-9.424significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.857STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.352k=2+0.021k=3-0.056k=4-0.046k=5-0.0480+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.35 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=9.42)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2470048
SLUGmlb-mia-pit-2026-06-14
CATEGORYMiami Marlins vs. Pittsburgh Pirates
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES40.50¢implied prob 40.50% · decimal odds 2.47×
COUNTER · NO59.50¢implied prob 59.50% · decimal odds 1.68×
40.50¢
59.50¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME63.19k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY157.99k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (60¢)|primary − counter| = 0.190 · entropy 0.974 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 40.5%NO 59.5%YES40.5%H = 0.974 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES2.47×(41¢)NO1.68×(60¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.974 bits (97% of max) · maximum uncertainty (~50/50)
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-21 16:15 UTC
7days
02hrs
40min
YES$1.00(P = 40.5%)
NO$0.00(P = 59.5%)
current: $0.4050 · expected return per side: $0.59 on YES hit · $0.41 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+3.6dRESOLVESP projection · σ=0.85% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 4.155 pp/day
now7.11d left
4.155 pp/day×1.00
−25%5.33d left
4.797 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.56d left
5.875 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.78d left
8.309 pp/day×2.00
−90%17.07h left
13.138 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 1.00% · worst -1.00% · typical |Δ| 0.17%BEARISH SESSION -2.00%BEST+1.00%19hWORST-1.00%18hTYPICAL |Δ|0.17%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE-2.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ -0.14% · Σ -1.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.12% · Σ -1.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.00% · Σ +0.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final -2.00%+0.00%-3.00%0.00% · 1h0.00% · 1h·1h0.00% · 2h0.00% · 2h·2h0.00% · 3h0.00% · 3h·3h-0.50% · 4h-0.50% · 4h-0.50%4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h-0.50% · 6h-0.50% · 6h-0.50%6h0.00% · 7h0.00% · 7h·7h0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h-1.00% · 12h-1.00% · 12h-1.00%12h0.00% · 13h0.00% · 13h·13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.00% · 15h0.00% · 15h·15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h-1.00% · 18h-1.00% · 18h-1.00%18h▼ WORST1.00% · 19h1.00% · 19h1.00%19h★ BEST0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h0.00% · 23h0.00% · 23h·23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+0.00%)RUNSup max 1 · down max 1BREADTH4% up · 17% down · 79% flat
1 up bars · 4 down · best 1.00% · worst -1.00% · typical |Δ| 0.167%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsLOSS WITH MODERATE DD (-2.00%)FINAL-2.00%MAX DD-2.97%RECOVERYONGOING · 21 barsMAX RUN-UP+0.00%UNDERWATER21/25 (84%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 0.9800 · peak 1.0000 · range [0.9703, 1.0000]1.00000.9703break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0000UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -2.97% · moderate0%-2.97%▼ TROUGH -2.97%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 1 total#1 -2.97%bar 5-25 · 21 bars · ONGOINGDD SEVERITYmoderate (max -2.97%)RECOVERYongoing · 21 barsTIME UNDER WATER84% of session · 21/25 bars
final equity 0.9800 (-2.00%) · max DD -2.97% · time-under-water 21/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +1 / −13 (5% positive) · μ=-28.81 · σ=27.32UNPROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 38.21 (+2.45σ vs μ)60.4230.210.00-30.21-60.42μ = -28.81-60.42-60.42-60.42-60.42-60.42-60.42-60.42-60.42-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.210.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0038.2138.21v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 38.210 · range [-60.42, 38.21] · μ -28.807 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=38.7646 · σ=14.3660 · range [19.1050, 59.1946] · R²=0.706 RISING +58.11%σ EXTREME 37.06%LAST 38.209959.194649.172239.149829.127419.1050μ = 38.7646max 59.1946min 19.1050dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.71μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 38.21% · range [19.10%, 59.19%] · μ 38.76% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +0 / −19 (0% positive) · μ=-0.298 · σ=0.203MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.033 (+1.31σ vs μ)0.5830.2920.000-0.292-0.583μ = -0.298-0.333-0.333-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.583-0.333-0.333-0.233-0.233-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.233-0.233-0.233-0.233-0.233-0.233-0.233-0.233-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.033-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.033-0.033v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.033 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 5 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·3 pass·1 n/a·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
18.3597
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
3.6104
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.6091
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-1.5987
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4863
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

N/An/a

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
p-VALUE (log scale)
no decision possibleinsufficient sign variety (1+/4-)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀**

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.8214
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0063
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-1.3558
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1752
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.587 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=1.67e-5 · top T=2.00h (33.3%) · top-3 cover 62.7%1 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEcumulative energy ↗ (1 bin above 2× noise)6.7e-55.0e-53.3e-51.7e-50.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 7.61e-6 · 3.8% energyperiod 24.0 · power 7.61e-6 · 3.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.68e-6 · 1.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.68e-6 · 1.8% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.80e-6 · 1.4% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.80e-6 · 1.4% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.98e-5 · 9.9% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.98e-5 · 9.9% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.42e-5 · 7.1% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.42e-5 · 7.1% energyperiod 4.0 · power 4.17e-6 · 2.1% energyperiod 4.0 · power 4.17e-6 · 2.1% energyperiod 3.4 · power 6.11e-6 · 3.1% energyperiod 3.4 · power 6.11e-6 · 3.1% energyperiod 3.0 · power 3.23e-5 · 16.1% energyperiod 3.0 · power 3.23e-5 · 16.1% energyperiod 2.7 · power 2.64e-5 · 13.2% energyperiod 2.7 · power 2.64e-5 · 13.2% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.09e-5 · 5.5% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.09e-5 · 5.5% energyperiod 2.2 · power 5.45e-6 · 2.7% energyperiod 2.2 · power 5.45e-6 · 2.7% energyperiod 2.0 · power 6.67e-5 · 33.3% energyperiod 2.0 · power 6.67e-5 · 33.3% energy50% by T=2.7h#1 dominantT=2.00h#2T=3.00h#3T=2.67hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.00h (freq 0.500) · concentrates 33.3% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 2.000e-4

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (1189 bars · effective 1752908 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 7.1 d · σ/bar 0.029pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.38ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.2410 · n = 1189n = 1189
μ per bar
+0.001pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.029pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.14pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move7d
0.38pp
σ × √170.67104722222223
Terminal variancebinary
0.2410
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
40.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.05pp · ES₉₅ 0.06pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.001pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 1.00pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 1189
VaR 95%
0.05pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.06pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
0.0pp
peak 39.5¢ → trough 39.5¢
Median step
1.00pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
40.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
2.469
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+147
$100 wins $147
FractionalUK
1.47 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$146.91
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 40.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.974 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.974 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
1.30 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.75 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
4856381045527401273294919918203615439073994036789576440851851654984351892834
NO token ID
23436737083305384325770870943584767657831353707856236049763759205782751634744
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 13:34:44 UTC
Snapshot age
11ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 13:34:44 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
dc553a7699924a8883755b3f545dff2525c9fdd829b6f2878d30e1972490b10c · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Miami Marlins vs. Pittsburgh Pirates

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.405000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
246.9bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.135
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.201
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-mlb-mia-pit-2026-06-14/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.410000123.46bp0.4100001FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.410000123.46bp0.4100001FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.4991602324.93bp0.90000029FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.400000123.46bp0.4000001FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.400000123.46bp0.4000001FILLED
SELL$100.00K0.2008185041.54bp0.01000031PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 1,189 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
96.04%
σ per bar = 0.000725
Mean return (annualised)
3688.97%
μ per bar = 0.000021
Sharpe (rf=0)
38.41
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
0.00%
peak 0.40 → trough 0.40 over 0 bars

/api/asset/pm-mlb-mia-pit-2026-06-14/risk · same metrics, JSON