POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · DETROIT TIGERS VS. CLEVELAND GUARDIANS

Detroit Tigers vs. Cleveland Guardians

YES · live
54.5¢
NO · live
45.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · mlb-det-cle-2026-06-14 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
92.36%
max drawdown
2.78%
sharpe
ulcer index
1.39%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.72%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
2.78%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
2.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
2.00
upside/downside
roll spread
0.5 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
1542
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-mlb-det-cle-2026-06-14/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH41ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
54.5¢
NO · live
45.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.5178 · σ=0.0469 · range [0.4800, 0.7050] · R²=0.569 RISING +46.87%σ HIGH 9.06%LAST 0.70500.70500.64870.59250.53630.4800μ = 0.5178max 0.7050min 0.4800dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.57μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 70.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 54.5%NO 45.5%YES54.5%54.50¢ · odds 1/1.83
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.994 / 1.00 bits (99%) · max uncertainty (~50/50)
YES
54.5%54.5¢1.83× +0.00pp
NO
45.5%45.5¢2.20× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=2,950 · μ=122.9 · σ=333.9 · CV=2.72BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=2404008001,2001,600μ = 1231,60050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 2950bp moved · peak 1600bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
41ms
YES mid
54.50¢ (54.50%)
NO mid
45.50¢ (45.50%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$98.2k
liquidity $
$9.8k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.5178 · σ=0.0469 · range [0.4800, 0.7050] · R²=0.569 RISING +46.87%σ HIGH 9.06%LAST 0.70500.70500.64870.59250.53630.4800μ = 0.5178max 0.7050min 0.4800dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.57μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 70.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.4822 · σ=0.0469 · range [0.2950, 0.5200] · R²=0.569 FALLING -43.27%σ HIGH 9.73%LAST 0.29500.52000.46370.40750.35130.2950μ = 0.4822max 0.5200min 0.2950dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.57μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 29.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0130 · σ=0.0306 · skew=3.80 (right-skewed) · kurt=14.34 (leptokurtic (fat tails))18149503-1.10ppbin -1.10pp · n=3 · 16.7% peakbin -1.10pp · n=3 · 16.7% peak180.70ppbin 0.70pp · n=18 · 100.0% peakbin 0.70pp · n=18 · 100.0% peak12.50ppbin 2.50pp · n=1 · 5.6% peakbin 2.50pp · n=1 · 5.6% peak14.30ppbin 4.30pp · n=1 · 5.6% peakbin 4.30pp · n=1 · 5.6% peak6.10pp7.90pp9.70pp11.50pp13.30pp115.10ppbin 15.10pp · n=1 · 5.6% peakbin 15.10pp · n=1 · 5.6% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=3.76 · kurt=13.86 · near 5 / mid 16 / far 3 · OLS slope=0.67 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALTHIN LOWER TAIL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+2.44σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=7.28)
μ MEAN51.78¢95% CI: [49.94¢, 53.62¢]
σ STD DEV4.69ppσ² = 22.023 · CV = 9.06%
med MEDIAN50.50¢Q₁ 48.50¢ · Q₃ 53.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 48.00¢Q₁ 48.50¢med 50.50¢Q₃ 53.50¢max 70.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁2.438right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂7.278leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.27
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 1.27
range ↔ σwide tails (range > 4σ)range / σ = 4.79
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ADF rejects unit root
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.058within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.035lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.812strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+5.505significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.812STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.058k=2-0.035k=3-0.003k=4+0.077k=5-0.0550+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ADF rejects unit rootfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.68very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=5.50)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2470058
SLUGmlb-det-cle-2026-06-14
CATEGORYDetroit Tigers vs. Cleveland Guardians
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES54.50¢implied prob 54.50% · decimal odds 1.83×
COUNTER · NO45.50¢implied prob 45.50% · decimal odds 2.20×
54.50¢
45.50¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME98.24k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY9.75k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS YES (55¢)|primary − counter| = 0.090 · entropy 0.994 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 54.5%NO 45.5%YES54.5%H = 0.994 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES1.83×(55¢)NO2.20×(46¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.994 bits (99% of max) · maximum uncertainty (~50/50)
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-21 17:40 UTC
6days
14hrs
09min
YES$1.00(P = 54.5%)
NO$0.00(P = 45.5%)
current: $0.5450 · expected return per side: $0.45 on YES hit · $0.55 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+3.3dRESOLVESP projection · σ=4.69% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 22.990 pp/day
now6.59d left
22.990 pp/day×1.00
−25%4.94d left
26.547 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.29d left
32.513 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.65d left
45.980 pp/day×2.00
−90%15.82h left
72.701 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 16.00% · worst -2.00% · typical |Δ| 1.23%MILD BULLISH +22.50%BEST+16.00%24hWORST-2.00%15hTYPICAL |Δ|1.23%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+22.50%Σ signed ΔSTREAK↗ 1up-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.07% · Σ +0.50%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.63% · Σ +5.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.13% · Σ +1.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +22.50%+22.50%0.00%0.50% · 1h0.50% · 1h0.50%1h0.00% · 2h0.00% · 2h·2h0.00% · 3h0.00% · 3h·3h0.00% · 4h0.00% · 4h·4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h-0.50% · 6h-0.50% · 6h-0.50%6h0.50% · 7h0.50% · 7h0.50%7h0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h1.00% · 10h1.00% · 10h1.00%10h1.00% · 11h1.00% · 11h1.00%11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h0.00% · 13h0.00% · 13h·13h5.00% · 14h5.00% · 14h5.00%14h-2.00% · 15h-2.00% · 15h-2.00%15h▼ WORST0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h-1.00% · 18h-1.00% · 18h-1.00%18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h2.00% · 20h2.00% · 20h2.00%20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h0.00% · 23h0.00% · 23h·23h16.00% · 24h16.00% · 24h16.00%24h★ BESTTIME PATTERNEurope-led (+5.00%)RUNSup max 2 · down max 1BREADTH29% up · 13% down · 58% flat
7 up bars · 3 down · best 16.00% · worst -2.00% · typical |Δ| 1.229%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +23.57%FINAL+23.57%MAX DD-2.98%RECOVERYFULLY RECOVEREDMAX RUN-UP+23.57%UNDERWATER13/25 (52%)STREAK↗ 1EQUITY CURVE · end 1.2357 · peak 1.2357 · range [1.0000, 1.2357]1.23571.0000break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.2357UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -2.98% · moderate0%-2.98%▼ TROUGH -2.98%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 2 total#1 -2.98%bar 16-24 · 9 bars · recovered#2 -0.50%bar 7-10 · 4 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYmoderate (max -2.98%)RECOVERYfully recoveredTIME UNDER WATER52% of session · 13/25 bars
final equity 1.2357 (23.57%) · max DD -2.98% · time-under-water 13/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +14 / −1 (74% positive) · μ=24.39 · σ=24.44PROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 43.74 (+0.79σ vs μ)79.3339.660.00-39.66-79.33μ = 24.390.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0030.2130.2151.5251.5279.3379.3360.4260.4256.2656.2633.6733.6726.6926.6919.9519.9512.8812.8812.8812.88-11.74-11.7415.8715.8715.8715.8715.8715.8743.7443.74v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 43.745 · range [-11.74, 79.33] · μ 24.390 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=137.3245 · σ=136.5965 · range [29.5973, 600.7595] · R²=0.372 RISING +1929.78%σ EXTREME 99.47%LAST 600.7595600.7595457.9690315.1784172.387929.5973μ = 137.3245max 600.7595min 29.5973dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.37μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 600.76% · range [29.60%, 600.76%] · μ 137.32% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +2 / −16 (11% positive) · μ=-0.210 · σ=0.230MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.073 (+0.59σ vs μ)0.5480.2740.000-0.274-0.548μ = -0.2100.0000.000-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.208-0.2080.0760.076-0.006-0.0060.1670.167-0.143-0.143-0.548-0.548-0.455-0.455-0.427-0.427-0.379-0.379-0.311-0.311-0.022-0.022-0.040-0.040-0.040-0.040-0.075-0.075-0.073-0.073v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.073 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
3 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence3 reject·3 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
372.6488
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
0.4080
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9933
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
0.8891
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9990
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
-0.1637
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.8700
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (5 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀**

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.8153
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0065
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

REJECT H₀*

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-2.0910
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0365
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zoneVR 0.364 → mean-reverting
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=1.22e-3 · top T=3.43h (16.7%) · top-3 cover 42.9%1 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEcumulative energy ↗ (1 bin above 2× noise)2.4e-31.8e-31.2e-36.1e-40.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 6.66e-4 · 4.5% energyperiod 24.0 · power 6.66e-4 · 4.5% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.73e-3 · 11.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.73e-3 · 11.8% energyperiod 8.0 · power 6.84e-4 · 4.7% energyperiod 8.0 · power 6.84e-4 · 4.7% energyperiod 6.0 · power 8.72e-4 · 6.0% energyperiod 6.0 · power 8.72e-4 · 6.0% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.70e-3 · 11.6% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.70e-3 · 11.6% energyperiod 4.0 · power 7.64e-4 · 5.2% energyperiod 4.0 · power 7.64e-4 · 5.2% energyperiod 3.4 · power 2.44e-3 · 16.7% energyperiod 3.4 · power 2.44e-3 · 16.7% energyperiod 3.0 · power 3.47e-4 · 2.4% energyperiod 3.0 · power 3.47e-4 · 2.4% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.17e-3 · 8.0% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.17e-3 · 8.0% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.52e-3 · 10.4% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.52e-3 · 10.4% energyperiod 2.2 · power 6.31e-4 · 4.3% energyperiod 2.2 · power 6.31e-4 · 4.3% energyperiod 2.0 · power 2.11e-3 · 14.4% energyperiod 2.0 · power 2.11e-3 · 14.4% energy50% by T=3.4h#1 dominantT=3.43h#2T=2.00h#3T=12.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 3.43h (freq 0.292) · concentrates 16.7% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 1.464e-2

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (1542 bars · effective 1753200 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 6.6 d · σ/bar 0.070pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.88ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.2480 · n = 1542n = 1542
μ per bar
+0.001pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.070pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.34pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move7d
0.88pp
σ × √158.15437500000002
Terminal variancebinary
0.2480
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
54.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.11pp · ES₉₅ 0.14pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.001pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.50pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 1542
VaR 95%
0.11pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.14pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
2.8pp
peak 54.0¢ → trough 52.5¢
Median step
0.50pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
54.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
1.835
total return per $1
AmericanUS
-120
risk $120 to win $100
FractionalUK
0.83 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$83.49
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 54.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.994 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.994 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
0.88 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
1.14 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
12288629634122425617792181954872467680422585098128024124865951704978705497588
NO token ID
68500114350586369971933549595667263003571670130412296751402878172629738718027
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-15 03:30:44 UTC
Snapshot age
41ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-15 03:30:44 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
99efa62f04b9120a71eb9a8dc94e1f1ce3294fd0353949305cdbea90ca3c084f · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Detroit Tigers vs. Cleveland Guardians

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.680000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
4411.8bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.918
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
+0.913
bid-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-mlb-det-cle-2026-06-14/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.8433302401.91bp0.9900004PARTIAL
BUY$10.00K0.8433302401.91bp0.9900004PARTIAL
BUY$100.00K0.8433302401.91bp0.9900004PARTIAL
SELL$1.00K0.5201042351.41bp0.5200002FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.4842922878.07bp0.01000010PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.4842922878.07bp0.01000010PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 1,542 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
173.08%
σ per bar = 0.001307
Mean return (annualised)
4253.59%
μ per bar = 0.000024
Sharpe (rf=0)
24.58
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
2.78%
peak 0.54 → trough 0.53 over 200 bars

/api/asset/pm-mlb-det-cle-2026-06-14/risk · same metrics, JSON