POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · WEATHER & CLIMATE

Will the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 29°C on June 15?

YES · live
92.0¢
NO · live
8.0¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · highest-temperature-in-hong-kong-on-june-15-2026-29c · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
2470.83%
max drawdown
7.19%
sharpe
ulcer index
2.89%
RMS drawdown
pain index
1.16%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
7.19%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
9.08
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
9.08
upside/downside
roll spread
40.7 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
310
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-highest-temperature-in-hong-kong-on-june-15-2026-29c/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH5ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
92.0¢
NO · live
8.0¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.4652 · σ=0.1674 · range [0.1550, 0.9750] · R²=0.265 RISING +167.12%σ EXTREME 35.99%LAST 0.97500.97500.77000.56500.36000.1550μ = 0.4652max 0.9750min 0.1550dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.26μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 97.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 92.0%NO 8.0%YES92.0%92.00¢ · odds 1/1.09
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.402 / 1.00 bits (40%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
92.0%92.0¢1.09× +0.00pp
NO
8.0%8.0¢12.50× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=16,600 · μ=691.7 · σ=1187.6 · CV=1.72BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=2101,3622,7254,0875,450μ = 6925,45050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 16600bp moved · peak 5450bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
5ms
YES mid
92.00¢ (92.00%)
NO mid
8.00¢ (8.00%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$38.4k
liquidity $
$5.0k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.4652 · σ=0.1674 · range [0.1550, 0.9750] · R²=0.265 RISING +167.12%σ EXTREME 35.99%LAST 0.97500.97500.77000.56500.36000.1550μ = 0.4652max 0.9750min 0.1550dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.26μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 97.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.5342 · σ=0.1682 · range [0.0250, 0.8450] · R²=0.268 FALLING -96.06%σ EXTREME 31.48%LAST 0.02500.84500.64000.43500.23000.0250μ = 0.5342max 0.8450min 0.0250dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.27μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 2.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0191 · σ=0.1265 · skew=2.16 (right-skewed) · kurt=6.92 (leptokurtic (fat tails))1186302-18.18ppbin -18.18pp · n=2 · 18.2% peakbin -18.18pp · n=2 · 18.2% peak-10.53pp11-2.88ppbin -2.88pp · n=11 · 100.0% peakbin -2.88pp · n=11 · 100.0% peak94.77ppbin 4.77pp · n=9 · 81.8% peakbin 4.77pp · n=9 · 81.8% peak12.42pp120.07ppbin 20.07pp · n=1 · 9.1% peakbin 20.07pp · n=1 · 9.1% peak27.72pp35.37pp43.02pp150.67ppbin 50.67pp · n=1 · 9.1% peakbin 50.67pp · n=1 · 9.1% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=2.19 · kurt=7.54 · near 11 / mid 12 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.85 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+1.87σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=2.90)
μ MEAN46.52¢95% CI: [39.96¢, 53.08¢]
σ STD DEV16.74ppσ² = 280.385 · CV = 35.99%
med MEDIAN42.50¢Q₁ 39.00¢ · Q₃ 45.00¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 15.50¢Q₁ 39.00¢med 42.50¢Q₃ 45.00¢max 97.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁1.644right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂2.905leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.24
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 3.76
range ↔ σwide tails (range > 4σ)range / σ = 4.90
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MARTINGALE · UNPREDICTABLE
ρ(1) AUTOCORR+0.031within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.279lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.783strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+2.879significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.783STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1+0.031k=2-0.279k=3-0.056k=4+0.021k=5+0.0110+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMARTINGALE · UNPREDICTABLEfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.60high · clear structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=2.88)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2528210
SLUGhighest-temperature-in-hong-kong-on-june-15-2026-29c
CATEGORYWeather & Climate
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES92.00¢implied prob 92.00% · decimal odds 1.09×
COUNTER · NO8.00¢implied prob 8.00% · decimal odds 12.50×
92.00¢
8.00¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME38.40k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY5.01k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS YES (92¢)|primary − counter| = 0.840 · entropy 0.402 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 92.0%NO 8.0%YES92.0%H = 0.402 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES1.09×(92¢)NO12.50×(8¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.402 bits (40% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · HIGHresolves 2026-06-15 12:00 UTC
0days
06hrs
26min
YES$1.00(P = 92.0%)
NO$0.00(P = 8.0%)
current: $0.9200 · expected return per side: $0.08 on YES hit · $0.92 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+3.2hRESOLVESP projection · σ=16.74% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 82.032 pp/day
now6.44h left
82.032 pp/day×1.00
−25%4.83h left
94.722 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.22h left
116.011 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.61h left
164.064 pp/day×2.00
−90%0.64h left
259.408 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 54.50% · worst -22.00% · typical |Δ| 6.92%MILD BULLISH +61.00%BEST+54.50%22hWORST-22.00%21hTYPICAL |Δ|6.92%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+61.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK↗ 3up-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +1.14% · Σ +8.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.25% · Σ -2.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +5.94% · Σ +47.50%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +61.00%+61.00%-21.00%3.00% · 1h3.00% · 1h3.00%1h-3.00% · 2h-3.00% · 2h-3.00%2h4.00% · 3h4.00% · 3h4.00%3h-2.00% · 4h-2.00% · 4h-2.00%4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h8.50% · 6h8.50% · 6h8.50%6h-2.50% · 7h-2.50% · 7h-2.50%7h0.50% · 8h0.50% · 8h0.50%8h-6.00% · 9h-6.00% · 9h-6.00%9h2.50% · 10h2.50% · 10h2.50%10h1.00% · 11h1.00% · 11h1.00%11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h0.50% · 13h0.50% · 13h0.50%13h-0.50% · 14h-0.50% · 14h-0.50%14h0.00% · 15h0.00% · 15h·15h2.50% · 16h2.50% · 16h2.50%16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h3.50% · 18h3.50% · 18h3.50%18h5.50% · 19h5.50% · 19h5.50%19h-16.50% · 20h-16.50% · 20h-16.50%20h-22.00% · 21h-22.00% · 21h-22.00%21h▼ WORST54.50% · 22h54.50% · 22h54.50%22h★ BEST20.00% · 23h20.00% · 23h20.00%23h7.50% · 24h7.50% · 24h7.50%24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+47.50%)RUNSup max 3 · down max 2BREADTH54% up · 29% down · 17% flat
13 up bars · 7 down · best 54.50% · worst -22.00% · typical |Δ| 6.917%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +53.05%FINAL+53.05%MAX DD-34.87%RECOVERYFULLY RECOVEREDMAX RUN-UP+53.05%UNDERWATER16/25 (64%)STREAK↗ 3EQUITY CURVE · end 1.5305 · peak 1.5305 · range [0.7679, 1.5305]1.53050.7679break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.5305UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -34.87% · severe0%-34.87%▼ TROUGH -34.87%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 4 total#1 -34.87%bar 21-22 · 2 bars · recovered#2 -7.89%bar 8-18 · 11 bars · recovered#3 -3.00%bar 3-3 · 1 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYsevere (max -34.87%)RECOVERYfully recoveredTIME UNDER WATER64% of session · 16/25 bars
final equity 1.5305 (53.05%) · max DD -34.87% · time-under-water 16/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +13 / −6 (68% positive) · μ=18.43 · σ=29.25PROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 27.68 (+0.32σ vs μ)71.4535.730.00-35.73-71.45μ = 18.4338.2138.2117.1617.1631.8431.84-4.81-4.819.579.5712.7712.77-23.05-23.05-7.94-7.94-13.34-13.3451.1051.1051.1051.1036.5036.5058.0558.0571.4571.45-9.80-9.80-36.02-36.0214.4014.4025.3625.3627.6827.68v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 27.679 · range [-36.02, 71.45] · μ 18.433 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=718.1773 · σ=857.0479 · range [100.0050, 2590.9049] · R²=0.407 RISING +544.21%σ EXTREME 119.34%LAST 2584.58582590.90491968.17991345.4549722.7300100.0050μ = 718.1773max 2590.9049min 100.0050dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.41μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 2584.59% · range [100.00%, 2590.90%] · μ 718.18% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +3 / −16 (16% positive) · μ=-0.181 · σ=0.232MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.012 (+0.73σ vs μ)0.4910.2450.000-0.245-0.491μ = -0.181-0.330-0.330-0.491-0.491-0.440-0.440-0.202-0.202-0.343-0.343-0.291-0.291-0.406-0.406-0.373-0.373-0.264-0.2640.2320.232-0.103-0.103-0.257-0.257-0.250-0.2500.1700.170-0.198-0.1980.3470.347-0.219-0.219-0.009-0.009-0.012-0.012v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.012 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
1 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence1 reject·5 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
115.6203
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
2.3495
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.8009
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-0.9472
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.7714
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
1.4724
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1409
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (13 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.4154
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0705
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedstationary not rejected (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-0.3730
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.7091
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.886 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=1.82e-2 · top T=4.00h (15.6%) · top-3 cover 39.7%WHITE NOISE · no dominant cyclecumulative energy ↗ (0 bins above 2× noise)3.4e-22.5e-21.7e-28.5e-30.0e+0μ noise floorperiod 24.0 · power 1.25e-2 · 5.7% energyperiod 24.0 · power 1.25e-2 · 5.7% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.10e-2 · 5.0% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.10e-2 · 5.0% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.02e-2 · 9.3% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.02e-2 · 9.3% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.23e-2 · 14.8% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.23e-2 · 14.8% energyperiod 4.8 · power 2.02e-2 · 9.3% energyperiod 4.8 · power 2.02e-2 · 9.3% energyperiod 4.0 · power 3.40e-2 · 15.6% energyperiod 4.0 · power 3.40e-2 · 15.6% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.92e-2 · 8.8% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.92e-2 · 8.8% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.80e-2 · 8.3% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.80e-2 · 8.3% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.96e-2 · 9.0% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.96e-2 · 9.0% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.55e-2 · 7.1% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.55e-2 · 7.1% energyperiod 2.2 · power 3.43e-3 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.2 · power 3.43e-3 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.21e-2 · 5.6% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.21e-2 · 5.6% energy50% by T=4.0h#1 dominantT=4.00h#2T=6.00h#3T=8.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 4.00h (freq 0.250) · concentrates 15.6% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 2.179e-1

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (310 bars · effective 1753395 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 0.3 d · σ/bar 1.867pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 4.74ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0736 · n = 310n = 310
μ per bar
+0.157pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
1.867pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
9.14pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move0d
4.74pp
σ × √6.440111944444444
Terminal variancebinary
0.0736
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
92.0¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 2.91pp · ES₉₅ 3.69pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.157pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 5.50pp · unique ratio 0.02n = 310
VaR 95%
2.91pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
3.69pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
7.2pp
peak 83.5¢ → trough 77.5¢
Median step
5.50pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
92.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
1.087
total return per $1
AmericanUS
-1150
risk $1150 to win $100
FractionalUK
0.09 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$8.70
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 92.0%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.402 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.402 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
0.12 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
3.64 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
62206187304311511066404748957048308114840214593170589502016591380727698205866
NO token ID
44873952444259915158415438992166076888418206560616079112098258125716443815895
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-15 05:33:35 UTC
Snapshot age
5ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-15 05:33:35 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
b35492d2a1685387dbdb7efc1a93e5ba206a0ee130c10095d1c4e12769d526db · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Weather & Climate

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.973500
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
133.5bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.736
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.639
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-highest-temperature-in-hong-kong-on-june-15-2026-29c/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.985075118.90bp0.9900002FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.992573195.92bp0.9990005PARTIAL
BUY$100.00K0.992573195.92bp0.9990005PARTIAL
SELL$1.00K0.960058138.08bp0.9600003FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.2427827506.09bp0.00100033PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.2427827506.09bp0.00100033PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 310 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
4082.28%
σ per bar = 0.030829
Mean return (annualised)
425029.51%
μ per bar = 0.002424
Sharpe (rf=0)
104.12
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
7.19%
peak 0.83 → trough 0.78 over 47 bars

/api/asset/pm-highest-temperature-in-hong-kong-on-june-15-2026-29c/risk · same metrics, JSON