POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · ELON MUSK # TWEETS JUNE 12 - JUNE 19, 2026?

Will Elon Musk post 180-199 tweets from June 12 to June 19, 2026?

YES · live
47.5¢
NO · live
52.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · elon-musk-of-tweets-june-12-june-19-180-199 · fresh · feed 4s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts 46.15%
realized vol (ann.)
339.47%
max drawdown
22.89%
sharpe
ulcer index
8.82%
RMS drawdown
pain index
5.96%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
20.29%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
1.23
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
1.23
upside/downside
roll spread
1.5 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
46.15%
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 25%
  • 24h change +46.15%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-12-june-19-180-199/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH4.1s--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
47.5¢
NO · live
52.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.4008 · σ=0.0497 · range [0.3150, 0.4850] · R²=0.447 RISING +46.15%σ HIGH 12.40%LAST 0.47500.48500.44250.40000.35750.3150μ = 0.4008max 0.4850min 0.3150dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.45μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 47.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 47.5%NO 52.5%NO52.5%52.50¢ · odds 1/1.90
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.998 / 1.00 bits (100%) · max uncertainty (~50/50)
YES
47.5%47.5¢2.11× +0.00pp
NO
52.5%52.5¢1.90× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=5,000 · μ=208.3 · σ=204.7 · CV=0.98BURSTYcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=140212425637850μ = 20885050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 5000bp moved · peak 850bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
4.1s
YES mid
47.50¢ (47.50%)
NO mid
52.50¢ (52.50%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$74.1k
liquidity $
$25.9k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.4008 · σ=0.0497 · range [0.3150, 0.4850] · R²=0.447 RISING +46.15%σ HIGH 12.40%LAST 0.47500.48500.44250.40000.35750.3150μ = 0.4008max 0.4850min 0.3150dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.45μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 47.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.5992 · σ=0.0497 · range [0.5150, 0.6850] · R²=0.447 FALLING -22.22%σ HIGH 8.29%LAST 0.52500.68500.64250.60000.55750.5150μ = 0.5992max 0.6850min 0.5150dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.45μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 52.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0068 · σ=0.0277 · skew=-0.88 (left-skewed) · kurt=1.64 (leptokurtic (fat tails))975201-7.77ppbin -7.77pp · n=1 · 11.1% peakbin -7.77pp · n=1 · 11.1% peak-6.32pp-4.87pp1-3.42ppbin -3.42pp · n=1 · 11.1% peakbin -3.42pp · n=1 · 11.1% peak1-1.97ppbin -1.97pp · n=1 · 11.1% peakbin -1.97pp · n=1 · 11.1% peak9-0.52ppbin -0.52pp · n=9 · 100.0% peakbin -0.52pp · n=9 · 100.0% peak10.93ppbin 0.93pp · n=1 · 11.1% peakbin 0.93pp · n=1 · 11.1% peak82.38ppbin 2.38pp · n=8 · 88.9% peakbin 2.38pp · n=8 · 88.9% peak13.82ppbin 3.82pp · n=1 · 11.1% peakbin 3.82pp · n=1 · 11.1% peak25.27ppbin 5.27pp · n=2 · 22.2% peakbin 5.27pp · n=2 · 22.2% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-1.01 · kurt=2.61 · near 17 / mid 6 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.96 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25APPROXIMATELY NORMAL · WELL-BEHAVED
μ MEAN40.08¢95% CI: [38.13¢, 42.03¢]
σ STD DEV4.97ppσ² = 24.702 · CV = 12.40%
med MEDIAN39.50¢Q₁ 37.50¢ · Q₃ 43.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 31.50¢Q₁ 37.50¢med 39.50¢Q₃ 43.50¢max 48.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁0.057approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-0.971mesokurtic · normal-like
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.12
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRconsistent with normalratio = 1.12
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.42
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: INDETERMINATE · weak signal at n=24
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.079within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.017lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT1.051strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+4.313significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 1.051STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.079k=2-0.017k=3-0.202k=4+0.335k=5-0.1030+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONINDETERMINATE · weak signal at n=24from Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=4.31)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2475930
SLUGelon-musk-of-tweets-june-12-june-19-180-199
CATEGORYElon Musk # tweets June 12 - June 19, 2026?
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES47.50¢implied prob 47.50% · decimal odds 2.11×
COUNTER · NO52.50¢implied prob 52.50% · decimal odds 1.90×
47.50¢
52.50¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME74.06k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY25.91k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (53¢)|primary − counter| = 0.050 · entropy 0.998 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 47.5%NO 52.5%YES47.5%H = 0.998 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES2.11×(48¢)NO1.90×(53¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.998 bits (100% of max) · maximum uncertainty (~50/50)
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · MEDIUMresolves 2026-06-19 16:00 UTC
1days
03hrs
42min
YES$1.00(P = 47.5%)
NO$0.00(P = 52.5%)
current: $0.4750 · expected return per side: $0.53 on YES hit · $0.47 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+0.6dRESOLVESP projection · σ=4.97% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 24.348 pp/day
now1.15d left
24.348 pp/day×1.00
−25%20.78h left
28.115 pp/day×1.15
−50%13.85h left
34.434 pp/day×1.41
−75%6.93h left
48.697 pp/day×2.00
−90%2.77h left
76.996 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 6.00% · worst -8.50% · typical |Δ| 2.08%MILD BULLISH +15.00%BEST+6.00%19hWORST-8.50%14hTYPICAL |Δ|2.08%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+15.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +1.29% · Σ +9.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.88% · Σ -7.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +1.63% · Σ +13.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +15.00%+16.00%-1.00%-1.00% · 1h-1.00% · 1h-1.00%1h2.00% · 2h2.00% · 2h2.00%2h4.00% · 3h4.00% · 3h4.00%3h2.00% · 4h2.00% · 4h2.00%4h-2.00% · 5h-2.00% · 5h-2.00%5h2.00% · 6h2.00% · 6h2.00%6h2.00% · 7h2.00% · 7h2.00%7h2.00% · 8h2.00% · 8h2.00%8h-1.00% · 9h-1.00% · 9h-1.00%9h-3.00% · 10h-3.00% · 10h-3.00%10h2.00% · 11h2.00% · 11h2.00%11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h0.00% · 13h0.00% · 13h·13h-8.50% · 14h-8.50% · 14h-8.50%14h▼ WORST1.50% · 15h1.50% · 15h1.50%15h2.00% · 16h2.00% · 16h2.00%16h2.00% · 17h2.00% · 17h2.00%17h-1.00% · 18h-1.00% · 18h-1.00%18h6.00% · 19h6.00% · 19h6.00%19h★ BEST0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h5.00% · 21h5.00% · 21h5.00%21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h-1.00% · 23h-1.00% · 23h-1.00%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+13.00%)RUNSup max 3 · down max 2BREADTH50% up · 29% down · 21% flat
12 up bars · 7 down · best 6.00% · worst -8.50% · typical |Δ| 2.083%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +15.02%FINAL+15.02%MAX DD-10.38%RECOVERYONGOING · 12 barsMAX RUN-UP+16.18%UNDERWATER17/25 (68%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.1502 · peak 1.1618 · range [0.9900, 1.1618]1.16180.9900break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.1618UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -10.38% · significant0%-10.38%▼ TROUGH -10.38%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 4 total#1 -10.38%bar 10-21 · 12 bars · recovered#2 -2.00%bar 6-7 · 2 bars · recovered#3 -1.00%bar 2-2 · 1 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYsignificant (max -10.38%)RECOVERYongoing · 16 barsTIME UNDER WATER68% of session · 17/25 bars
final equity 1.1502 (15.02%) · max DD -10.38% · time-under-water 17/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +12 / −5 (63% positive) · μ=26.03 · σ=39.72MIXED EDGELAST 51.81 (+0.65σ vs μ)79.9239.960.00-39.96-79.92μ = 26.0349.0049.0079.3379.3379.3379.3342.5142.510.000.0028.8828.8815.1015.100.000.00-44.45-44.45-31.83-31.83-11.63-11.63-11.63-11.63-15.52-15.526.406.4068.1668.1679.9279.9264.5964.5944.6244.6251.8151.81v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 51.806 · range [-44.45, 79.92] · μ 26.030 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=271.6291 · σ=87.2803 · range [171.7323, 456.2850] · R²=0.284 RISING +35.11%σ EXTREME 32.13%LAST 281.8226456.2850385.1468314.0087242.8705171.7323μ = 271.6291max 456.2850min 171.7323dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.28μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 281.82% · range [171.73%, 456.28%] · μ 271.63% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +2 / −17 (11% positive) · μ=-0.235 · σ=0.266MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.208 (+0.10σ vs μ)0.7620.3810.000-0.381-0.762μ = -0.235-0.095-0.095-0.040-0.040-0.075-0.075-0.358-0.3580.1920.1920.1100.110-0.052-0.052-0.278-0.278-0.115-0.115-0.380-0.380-0.167-0.167-0.105-0.105-0.126-0.126-0.129-0.129-0.686-0.686-0.690-0.690-0.762-0.762-0.500-0.500-0.208-0.208v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.208 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
17.2587
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0002
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
5.2274
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3891
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-1.4892
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.5385
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
0.5899
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.5552
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (11 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.4670
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0491
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-0.1645
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.8694
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.950 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=8.66e-4 · top T=4.80h (17.8%) · top-3 cover 50.0%1 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEcumulative energy ↗ (1 bin above 2× noise)1.8e-31.4e-39.2e-44.6e-40.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 6.93e-4 · 6.7% energyperiod 24.0 · power 6.93e-4 · 6.7% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.12e-3 · 10.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.12e-3 · 10.8% energyperiod 8.0 · power 5.40e-4 · 5.2% energyperiod 8.0 · power 5.40e-4 · 5.2% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.23e-5 · 0.3% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.23e-5 · 0.3% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.85e-3 · 17.8% energyperiod 4.8 · power 1.85e-3 · 17.8% energyperiod 4.0 · power 1.43e-3 · 13.7% energyperiod 4.0 · power 1.43e-3 · 13.7% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.63e-4 · 1.6% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.63e-4 · 1.6% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.97e-4 · 6.7% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.97e-4 · 6.7% energyperiod 2.7 · power 4.90e-4 · 4.7% energyperiod 2.7 · power 4.90e-4 · 4.7% energyperiod 2.4 · power 3.40e-5 · 0.3% energyperiod 2.4 · power 3.40e-5 · 0.3% energyperiod 2.2 · power 1.68e-3 · 16.2% energyperiod 2.2 · power 1.68e-3 · 16.2% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.67e-3 · 16.0% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.67e-3 · 16.0% energy50% by T=4.0h#1 dominantT=4.80h#2T=2.18h#3T=2.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 4.80h (freq 0.208) · concentrates 17.8% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 1.039e-2

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (5000 bars · effective 1752421 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 1.2 d · σ/bar 0.209pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 1.10ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.2494 · n = 5000n = 5000
μ per bar
+0.002pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.209pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
1.02pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move1d
1.10pp
σ × √27.7021175
Terminal variancebinary
0.2494
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
47.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.34pp · ES₉₅ 0.43pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.002pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 1.00pp · unique ratio 0.01n = 5000
VaR 95%
0.34pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.43pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
26.4pp
peak 43.5¢ → trough 32.0¢
Median step
1.00pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
47.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
2.105
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+111
$100 wins $111
FractionalUK
1.11 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$110.53
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 47.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.998 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.998 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
1.07 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.93 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
32274422891529870738152764611321499587948252928843224735938242651992646154802
NO token ID
52028324116156446664834991610158358469185181677089964845286296136348867384326
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-18 12:17:48 UTC
Snapshot age
4.1s
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-18 12:17:52 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
992a912297bea99687bafc86698fca5eefa9cae005a5bfe3467cddbf98f49532 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Elon Musk # tweets June 12 - June 19, 2026?

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.475000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
210.5bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.346
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.194
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-12-june-19-180-199/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.484488199.74bp0.4900002FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.5438941450.40bp0.65000017FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.8191597245.45bp0.99000041PARTIAL
SELL$1.00K0.470000105.26bp0.4700001FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.1608066614.60bp0.01000042PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.1608066614.60bp0.01000042PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 5,000 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
746.72%
σ per bar = 0.005641
Mean return (annualised)
8286.71%
μ per bar = 0.000047
Sharpe (rf=0)
11.10
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
26.44%
peak 0.43 → trough 0.32 over 1171 bars

/api/asset/pm-elon-musk-of-tweets-june-12-june-19-180-199/risk · same metrics, JSON