NOSTRADAMUS · Position Analytics Engine

SIMULATOR Russia x Ukraine ceasefire agreement by June 30, 2026?

A live, interactive instrument for dissecting a single binary position. Sweep the inputs and watch every indicator recompute — payoff geometry, Kelly growth, Bayesian posterior, KL divergence, cost waterfall, Monte-Carlo equity fan, forecast calibration. Companion to the live /feed/pm-russia-x-ukraine-ceasefire-agreement-by-june-30-2026 page.

▲ YES EDGE · +0.034 · f★ 3.5% · deploy 1.8% · net 2.64pp

§1 · Position economics

Payoff diagram · binary contract P/L vs resolution
YES · Expected P/L per share +0.0339@ model P(YES) = 0.076
-1.00-0.50+0.00+0.50+1.000.000.200.400.600.801.00price 0.043model 0.076YES resolution priceP/L per $1 contract
P/L per sharemarket pricemodel Pprofit zoneloss zone
Profit is linear in the eventual settlement price.
Kelly growth curve · g(f) with f★ and deployed f markers
f★ = 3.54% · g(f★) = 1.149%deploy 1.77% · g = 0.913%
-5.45%-3.76%-2.06%-0.37%1.32%0%8%16%24%32%40%f★ optimumdeployfraction of bankroll fexpected log-growth g(f)
g(f)f★ optimumdeployed fgrowth zone
Underbet leaves growth on the table; overbet destroys capital. The interior maximum is f★.

§2 · The trade ticket

Trade ticket · dollar outcomes at this stake
YES @ 0.043 · EV +$352stake $442 · 1.77% of bankroll
Deployed stakestake
$442
1.77% of bankroll
Sharesunits
10,402
each pays $1 if YES
Max payoutwin
$10,402
gross, if win
Max profitwin
+$9,960
net of cost
Max losslose
-$442
binary settles to $0
Payout multiple×
×23.53
$1 → $23.53
Risk:RewardR:R
22.53 : 1
win $22.53 per $1
Expected P/LE[P/L]
+$352
probability-weighted
OutcomeP(model)P/LContribution
Resolves YES (win)7.6%+$9,960+$761
Resolves against (lose)92.4%-$442-$408
Expected value100.0%+$352
What you actually win and lose. The bottom table tabulates probability-weighted P/L by outcome.

§3 · Break-even & cushion

Break-even & cushion · margin of safety
Cushion +3.4 pprelative edge +79.7%
Required win ratebreak-even
4.3%
price = implied probability
Model win rateP(win)
7.6%
what you forecast
Cushionedge
+3.4 pp
margin of safety
Fair pricemodel
0.076
where you think it should trade
-60-3003060020406080100you @ 4.3%market price (%)cushion (pp)
The market price equals the win rate you must beat to make money.

§4 · Odds conversion

Implied probability, decimal, American, fractional
Implied probabilityP
4.3%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
23.529
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+2253
$100 wins $2253
FractionalUK
22.53 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$2252.94
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 4.3%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Five views of the same number.

§4b · Time & annualized return

Time & APR · capital lockup vs annualized return
APR 1385% · APY 2651098%ROI 79.7% over 21d · 17.4 turns/yr
Time to resolvehorizon
21.0 d
504h capital lockup
Raw ROIper resolve
+79.7%
APR (simple)scaled
+1385%
ROI × 365/days
APY (compounded)if redeployed
+2651098%
(1+ROI)^(365/d) − 1
Daily expectedper day
+2.83%
geometric, per day held
Capital turns/yrvelocity
×17.4
how often this slot recycles
0%583242%1166483%1749725%2332966%2916208%121416180100120now 21ddays to resolutionannualized return (capped 1000%)
simple APRcompounded APYyour horizon
Rank positions by APR, not raw ROI. A thin edge tomorrow beats a fat edge next year.

§5 · Costs & net edge

Cost waterfall · gross edge → net of friction
Net edge +2.64 pperosion 22% · break-even w/ fees 5.0%
-0.1pp0.8pp1.7pp2.6pp3.4pp4.3pp+3.39Gross edge-0.75- ½ spread+0.00- entry fee+0.00- exit fee+2.64Net edgeEV / share (pp)
gross edgefrictionnet edgefee 0 bps · spread 1.50¢
The number that decides whether to trade.

§6 · Sizing menu

Sizing menu · disciplined deployment
Full Kellyf★
$884
3.54% · g = 1.149%
Half Kelly½ f★
$442
1.77% · g = 0.913%
Quarter Kelly¼ f★
$221
0.88% · g = 0.567%
Flat 1%1%
$250
1.00% · g = 0.623%
Flat 2%2%
$500
2.00% · g = 0.975%
Flat 5%5%
$1,250
5.00% · g = 1.024%
Recommended¼ f★
$221
survives model error
$0$369$738$1,106$1,475$884Full Kelly3.54%$442Half Kelly1.77%$221Quarter Kelly0.88%$250Flat 1%1.00%$500Flat 2%2.00%$1,250Flat 5%5.00%
Quarter-Kelly is the industry default — survives model error far better than full Kelly.

§7 · Information theory

Binary entropy · uncertainty in bits
Market entropyH(p)
0.254 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.389 bit
Δ +0.136 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
4.56 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.06 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
H(p) peaks at p = 0.5 (one bit of irreducible doubt).
KL divergence · upper bound on exploitable edge
NOISE · D_KL(q ‖ p) = 0.0115 nat (0.0166 bit)belief ≈ market — stand down
-0.041-0.0160.0090.0330.0580.0447YES branch-0.0333NO branchΣKL = 0.0115 natKL contribution (nat)
YES contributionNO contributionbelief ‖ marketnoise
Zero KL ⇒ you know nothing the crowd doesn't.

§8 · Bayesian inference

Bayesian posterior · prior + evidence → belief with 95% CI
MARKET PRICE INSIDE 95% CIposterior μ 0.076 · CI [0.01, 0.23] · κ 18.6
Posterior meanE[θ]
0.076
Beta(1.4, 17.2)
95% credible intervalHDI
[0.01, 0.23]
price INSIDE → weak edge
Concentrationκ
18.6
pseudo-obs behind belief
Disagreementvs crowd
+3.4 pp
posterior − price
0.000.200.400.600.801.00marketposterior μprobability θposterior density
market prior (dashed)model posterior95% credible bandmarket price
When the market price falls outside the 95% credible interval, your disagreement is statistically meaningful.

§9 · Tail risk · Monte-Carlo (mode A · single position to resolution)

Mark-to-market MC · single position held to resolution
E[P/L] +70.6% · P(YES) 7.2% · VaR₉₅ 100.0%400 paths · 504 bars to resolution
Expected P/Lper $1
+70.59%
P(YES) empiricalq
7.2%
Best pathmax
+2252.9%
Worst pathmin
-100.0%
VaR 95%5%
100.0%
CVaR 95%ES
100.0%
25¢50¢75¢100¢084168252336420504entry 4.3¢model q 7.6¢bars until resolutionprice path
median path25/75 + 5/95 bandsentry pricemodel q
Logit-space mean-reverting walk + terminal flip with probability q. Answers: 'what happens to THIS one position'. Distinct from the repeated-edge fan below.

§9b · Tail risk · Monte-Carlo (mode B · repeated independent edges)

Monte-Carlo equity fan · this profile, repeated 400× independently
Median CAGR/bet 1.03% · ruin rate 8.8%400 paths × 120 bets · f deploy 1.77%
Sharpe / betμ/σ
0.139
μ 1.57% · σ 11.3%
Sortino / betμ/σ↓
0.887
downside-only denominator
VaR 95%5%
-1.8%
per-bet worst-case
CVaR 95%ES
-1.8%
mean tail loss
Max drawdownMDD
-20.7%
Calmar 0.05
Ruin rate≤50%
8.8%
P(equity ever ≤ 50%)
0.48×5.32×10.16×14.99×19.83×24.66×020406080100120startruin 50%bet #bankroll multiple
median25/75 band5/95 bandruin line
Answers a different question: 'if I could find this exact edge forever, what is the bankroll trajectory'. Compounds 120 sequential resolutions which is NOT what happens to a single position.

§10 · Base-rate & macro context

Probability stack · base rate vs crowd vs model
ANCHORED · supported by convictionanchor gap -50.3pp · crowd gap -53.6pp
0%20%40%60%80%100%Reference base rate57.9%Market price4.3%Model P(YES)7.6%
Anchor gapmodel − base
-50.3 pp
Crowd gapprice − base
-53.6 pp
Verdictdiscipline
ANCHORED
Reference-class anchoring prevents narrative-driven blowups.

§11 · Forecast quality (synthetic ledger)

Brier · Murphy decomposition · reliability · ROC
SKILL POSITIVE · in-sample BSS 17.5% · AUC 0.753out-of-sample BSS (5-fold) 17.5% ± 1.6% · Brier 0.2061 · log-loss 0.6109 · n 1600n = 1600
BrierBS
0.2061
lower = better · ō 0.48
BSSvs base
17.5%
improvement over base rate
ReliabilityREL
0.0053
miscalibration · want ↓
ResolutionRES
0.0499
decisiveness · want ↑
Log lossLL
0.6109
cross-entropy
AUCROC
0.753
0.5 coin · 1.0 oracle
0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.20.40.60.81.0stated probability fobserved frequency ō0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.20.40.60.81.0AUC = 0.753false positive ratetrue positive rate0.0000.0750.1500.2250.3000.250UNC0.050RES0.005REL0.206BRIERcontribution
calibration curveROCUNC (irreducible)RES (skill, ↑)REL (miscalib, ↓)
Computed on a seeded synthetic forecast ledger. Reseed (⟳) to redraw.

§12 · Journal vitals (synthetic ledger)

Track record · win rate · PF · expectancy · CLV · equity curve
PROFITABLE · PF 1.31 · expectancy +0.146R180 trades · win 52.8% · Sharpe 0.096
Total P/Lnet
+$6,574
on $45,000 cycled
Win ratehit %
52.8%
95 W / 85 L
Profit factorPF
1.31
$ won / $ lost
Expectancyper trade
+$36.52
avg $ per position
R-expectancyper risk
+0.146R
in units of risk taken
Avg win / losspayoff
$292.88 / -$250.00
ratio 1.17 : 1
Sharpe / traderisk-adj
0.096
μR / σR
Closing line valueCLV
+2.81 pp
avg edge vs close
-$1,490$793$3,075$5,358$7,64103672108144180trade #cumulative P/L (USD)
cumulative P/Lprofitable zonered zonesynthetic · seeded from asset
The scorecard every trader checks. Synthetic ledger seeded from the asset slug — recomputes against your real fill history once wired.

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · russia-x-ukraine-ceasefire-agreement-by-june-30-2026 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts 8.97%
realized vol (ann.)
69.71%
max drawdown
37.04%
sharpe
ulcer index
26.77%
RMS drawdown
pain index
23.40%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
34.84%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
0.55
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
0.55
upside/downside
roll spread
4.1 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
8.97%
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 25%
  • 24h change +8.97%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-russia-x-ukraine-ceasefire-agreement-by-june-30-2026/bundle · venue execution: polymarket