NOSTRADAMUS · Position Analytics Engine

SIMULATOR India vs Pakistan Winner?

A live, interactive instrument for dissecting a single binary position. Sweep the inputs and watch every indicator recompute — payoff geometry, Kelly growth, Bayesian posterior, KL divergence, cost waterfall, Monte-Carlo equity fan, forecast calibration. Companion to the live /feed/kalshi-kxwt20match-26jun140930pakind-pak page.

▲ YES EDGE · +0.025 · f★ 2.5% · deploy 1.3% · net 1.75pp

§1 · Position economics

Payoff diagram · binary contract P/L vs resolution
YES · Expected P/L per share +0.0250@ model P(YES) = 0.035
-1.00-0.50+0.00+0.50+1.000.000.200.400.600.801.00price 0.010model 0.035YES resolution priceP/L per $1 contract
P/L per sharemarket pricemodel Pprofit zoneloss zone
Profit is linear in the eventual settlement price.
Kelly growth curve · g(f) with f★ and deployed f markers
f★ = 2.52% · g(f★) = 1.913%deploy 1.26% · g = 1.609%
-7.74%-5.25%-2.77%-0.28%2.20%0%8%16%24%32%40%f★ optimumdeployfraction of bankroll fexpected log-growth g(f)
g(f)f★ optimumdeployed fgrowth zone
Underbet leaves growth on the table; overbet destroys capital. The interior maximum is f★.

§2 · The trade ticket

Trade ticket · dollar outcomes at this stake
YES @ 0.010 · EV +$787stake $315 · 1.26% of bankroll
Deployed stakestake
$315
1.26% of bankroll
Sharesunits
31,530
each pays $1 if YES
Max payoutwin
$31,530
gross, if win
Max profitwin
+$31,214
net of cost
Max losslose
-$315
binary settles to $0
Payout multiple×
×100.00
$1 → $100.00
Risk:RewardR:R
99.00 : 1
win $99.00 per $1
Expected P/LE[P/L]
+$787
probability-weighted
OutcomeP(model)P/LContribution
Resolves YES (win)3.5%+$31,214+$1,092
Resolves against (lose)96.5%-$315-$304
Expected value100.0%+$787
What you actually win and lose. The bottom table tabulates probability-weighted P/L by outcome.

§3 · Break-even & cushion

Break-even & cushion · margin of safety
Cushion +2.5 pprelative edge +249.7%
Required win ratebreak-even
1.0%
price = implied probability
Model win rateP(win)
3.5%
what you forecast
Cushionedge
+2.5 pp
margin of safety
Fair pricemodel
0.035
where you think it should trade
-60-3003060020406080100you @ 1.0%market price (%)cushion (pp)
The market price equals the win rate you must beat to make money.

§4 · Odds conversion

Implied probability, decimal, American, fractional
Implied probabilityP
1.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
100.000
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+9900
$100 wins $9900
FractionalUK
99.00 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$9900.00
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 1.0%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Five views of the same number.

§4b · Time & annualized return

Time & APR · capital lockup vs annualized return
APR 4340% · APY 282014497134%ROI 249.7% over 21d · 17.4 turns/yr
Time to resolvehorizon
21.0 d
504h capital lockup
Raw ROIper resolve
+249.7%
APR (simple)scaled
+4340%
ROI × 365/days
APY (compounded)if redeployed
+282014497134%
(1+ROI)^(365/d) − 1
Daily expectedper day
+6.14%
geometric, per day held
Capital turns/yrvelocity
×17.4
how often this slot recycles
0%62043189369%124086378739%186129568108%248172757478%310215946847%121416180100120now 21ddays to resolutionannualized return (capped 1000%)
simple APRcompounded APYyour horizon
Rank positions by APR, not raw ROI. A thin edge tomorrow beats a fat edge next year.

§5 · Costs & net edge

Cost waterfall · gross edge → net of friction
Net edge +1.75 pperosion 30% · break-even w/ fees 1.8%
-0.1pp0.6pp1.2pp1.9pp2.6pp3.2pp+2.50Gross edge-0.75- ½ spread+0.00- entry fee+0.00- exit fee+1.75Net edgeEV / share (pp)
gross edgefrictionnet edgefee 0 bps · spread 1.50¢
The number that decides whether to trade.

§6 · Sizing menu

Sizing menu · disciplined deployment
Full Kellyf★
$631
2.52% · g = 1.913%
Half Kelly½ f★
$315
1.26% · g = 1.609%
Quarter Kelly¼ f★
$158
0.63% · g = 1.086%
Flat 1%1%
$250
1.00% · g = 1.437%
Flat 2%2%
$500
2.00% · g = 1.869%
Flat 5%5%
$1,250
5.00% · g = 1.287%
Recommended¼ f★
$158
survives model error
$0$369$738$1,106$1,475$631Full Kelly2.52%$315Half Kelly1.26%$158Quarter Kelly0.63%$250Flat 1%1.00%$500Flat 2%2.00%$1,250Flat 5%5.00%
Quarter-Kelly is the industry default — survives model error far better than full Kelly.

§7 · Information theory

Binary entropy · uncertainty in bits
Market entropyH(p)
0.081 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.219 bit
Δ +0.138 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
6.64 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.01 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
H(p) peaks at p = 0.5 (one bit of irreducible doubt).
KL divergence · upper bound on exploitable edge
NOISE · D_KL(q ‖ p) = 0.0191 nat (0.0276 bit)belief ≈ market — stand down
-0.031-0.0090.0130.0350.0570.0438YES branch-0.0247NO branchΣKL = 0.0191 natKL contribution (nat)
YES contributionNO contributionbelief ‖ marketnoise
Zero KL ⇒ you know nothing the crowd doesn't.

§8 · Bayesian inference

Bayesian posterior · prior + evidence → belief with 95% CI
MARKET PRICE INSIDE 95% CIposterior μ 0.035 · CI [0.00, 0.23] · κ 8.4
Posterior meanE[θ]
0.035
Beta(0.3, 8.1)
95% credible intervalHDI
[0.00, 0.23]
price INSIDE → weak edge
Concentrationκ
8.4
pseudo-obs behind belief
Disagreementvs crowd
+1.5 pp
posterior − price
0.000.200.400.600.801.00marketposterior μprobability θposterior density
market prior (dashed)model posterior95% credible bandmarket price
When the market price falls outside the 95% credible interval, your disagreement is statistically meaningful.

§9 · Tail risk · Monte-Carlo (mode A · single position to resolution)

Mark-to-market MC · single position held to resolution
E[P/L] +250.0% · P(YES) 3.5% · VaR₉₅ 100.0%400 paths · 504 bars to resolution
Expected P/Lper $1
+250.00%
P(YES) empiricalq
3.5%
Best pathmax
+9900.0%
Worst pathmin
-100.0%
VaR 95%5%
100.0%
CVaR 95%ES
100.0%
25¢50¢75¢100¢084168252336420504entry 1.0¢model q 3.5¢bars until resolutionprice path
median path25/75 + 5/95 bandsentry pricemodel q
Logit-space mean-reverting walk + terminal flip with probability q. Answers: 'what happens to THIS one position'. Distinct from the repeated-edge fan below.

§9b · Tail risk · Monte-Carlo (mode B · repeated independent edges)

Monte-Carlo equity fan · this profile, repeated 400× independently
Median CAGR/bet 2.89% · ruin rate 8.3%400 paths × 120 bets · f deploy 1.26%
Sharpe / betμ/σ
0.178
μ 4.82% · σ 27.0%
Sortino / betμ/σ↓
3.821
downside-only denominator
VaR 95%5%
-1.3%
per-bet worst-case
CVaR 95%ES
-1.3%
mean tail loss
Max drawdownMDD
-22.4%
Calmar 0.13
Ruin rate≤50%
8.3%
P(equity ever ≤ 50%)
0.41×90.43×180.44×270.46×360.47×450.49×020406080100120startruin 50%bet #bankroll multiple
median25/75 band5/95 bandruin line
Answers a different question: 'if I could find this exact edge forever, what is the bankroll trajectory'. Compounds 120 sequential resolutions which is NOT what happens to a single position.

§10 · Base-rate & macro context

Probability stack · base rate vs crowd vs model
ANCHORED · supported by convictionanchor gap -47.9pp · crowd gap -50.4pp
0%20%40%60%80%100%Reference base rate51.4%Market price1.0%Model P(YES)3.5%
Anchor gapmodel − base
-47.9 pp
Crowd gapprice − base
-50.4 pp
Verdictdiscipline
ANCHORED
Reference-class anchoring prevents narrative-driven blowups.

§11 · Forecast quality (synthetic ledger)

Brier · Murphy decomposition · reliability · ROC
SKILL POSITIVE · in-sample BSS 21.7% · AUC 0.774out-of-sample BSS (5-fold) 21.7% ± 2.3% · Brier 0.1958 · log-loss 0.5835 · n 1600n = 1600
BrierBS
0.1958
lower = better · ō 0.50
BSSvs base
21.7%
improvement over base rate
ReliabilityREL
0.0030
miscalibration · want ↓
ResolutionRES
0.0585
decisiveness · want ↑
Log lossLL
0.5835
cross-entropy
AUCROC
0.774
0.5 coin · 1.0 oracle
0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.20.40.60.81.0stated probability fobserved frequency ō0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.20.40.60.81.0AUC = 0.774false positive ratetrue positive rate0.0000.0750.1500.2250.3000.250UNC0.058RES0.003REL0.196BRIERcontribution
calibration curveROCUNC (irreducible)RES (skill, ↑)REL (miscalib, ↓)
Computed on a seeded synthetic forecast ledger. Reseed (⟳) to redraw.

§12 · Journal vitals (synthetic ledger)

Track record · win rate · PF · expectancy · CLV · equity curve
PROFITABLE · PF 1.07 · expectancy +0.034R180 trades · win 53.9% · Sharpe 0.030
Total P/Lnet
+$1,512
on $45,000 cycled
Win ratehit %
53.9%
97 W / 83 L
Profit factorPF
1.07
$ won / $ lost
Expectancyper trade
+$8.40
avg $ per position
R-expectancyper risk
+0.034R
in units of risk taken
Avg win / losspayoff
$229.51 / -$250.00
ratio 0.92 : 1
Sharpe / traderisk-adj
0.030
μR / σR
Closing line valueCLV
+2.82 pp
avg edge vs close
-$2,641-$1,301$38$1,378$2,71703672108144180trade #cumulative P/L (USD)
cumulative P/Lprofitable zonered zonesynthetic · seeded from asset
The scorecard every trader checks. Synthetic ledger seeded from the asset slug — recomputes against your real fill history once wired.

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

kalshi · kxwt20match-26jun140930pakind-pak · fresh · feed 19s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
673.25%
max drawdown
95.65%
sharpe
ulcer index
34.21%
RMS drawdown
pain index
23.77%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.92%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
90.26%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
0.88
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
0.88
upside/downside
roll spread
848.7 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
429
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/kalshi-kxwt20match-26jun140930pakind-pak/bundle · venue execution: kalshi